Ten Essential, Timeless Female Teams in the Movies

Ten Essential, Timeless Female Teams in the Movies 

 

 

Annihilation.jpg

Director Alex Garland’s new science fiction thriller, “Annihilation”, invades theatres on Friday Feb. 23, as five armed women accept a mission to step into a bizarre, unknown phenomenon called The Shimmer which changes an ordinary American marshland into something else.   Natalie Portman, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Tessa Thompson, Gina Rodriguez, and Tuva Novotny play the women from the aforementioned group, and their work in this film certainly adds to the rich history of great female on-screen teams and duos throughout the decades.  Well, looking back through movie history, here are my picks for 10 essential and timeless ones.    

 

Bend it.jpg

Jess Bhamra, Juliette Paxton and the Hounslow Harriers - “Bend It Like Beckham” (2002) – Juliette (Keira Knightley) encourages Jess (Parminder Nagra) to step out of her comfort zone and play for an all-girls English football team.  The problem is that Jess’s parents are far more uncomfortable with this proposition, as this fun and inspiring comedy embraces family, friends and chasing one’s dreams.  Director Gurinder Chadha offers a refreshing look into East Indian culture and treats the characters and customs with grace, including a skillful blend of choreography between a traditional wedding and movement on the pitch in the rousing third act.  Nagra and Knightley display plenty of ample football skills too, but the film devotes more time to their off-field stories.  Be on the lookout for Anupam Kher, who also plays Azmat (the father) in 2017’s “The Big Sick”.

 

Faster.jpg

Varla, Rosie and Billie - “Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!” (1965) – “Ladies and Gentlemen, welcome to violence.”   Those words start director Russ Meyer’s 1-hour 23-minute foray into Varla’s (Tura Satana), Rosie’s (Haji) and Billie’s (Lori Williams) odd, twisted journey in the California desert.  Varla, a relentless instigator, leads this trio into trouble, including verbal and physical spats with an All-American couple and a half-baked plot to steal from an old man and his grown boys.  With heaps of an unapologetic, counterculture style and a cartoonish figure, Varla’s live fast, tough girl persona is only matched by her metaphorical speech.  Hey, Daddy-o, there ain’t nothin’ pleasant about this movie, but it’s a crazy, low-budget ride, Man.

 

Gentlemen Prefer.jpg

Dorothy Shaw and Lorelei Lee – “Gentlemen Prefer Blondes” (1953) – Dorothy (Jane Russell) and Lorelei (Marilyn Monroe) work as a lounge/club act, and exclaim – in song – that they are two girls from Little Rock.  Well, from Little Rock or not, they end up on a cruise ship heading for France in a breezy comedy, in which these two legendary heroines absolutely shine.  Russell and Monroe play polar opposites, as Dorothy’s pragmatism creates hilarious semi-combustible exchanges with the starry-eyed Lorelei who searches high and low for a millionaire to shower her with diamonds.  Actually, she doesn’t have to look terribly far, and the film features Monroe’s iconic delivery of “Diamonds are a Girl’s Best Friend”.  That same year, Monroe, Betty Grable and Lauren Bacall starred in “How to Marry a Millionaire”, and their three characters had a more focused goal as a team, but “Gentlemen Prefer Blondes” is a better movie.

 

Hidden Figures.jpg

Katherine G. Johnson, Dorothy Vaughan and Mary Jackson - “Hidden Figures” (2016) – When walking on the moon in 1969, Neil Armstrong said, “One small step for (a) man, one giant leap for mankind,” but three African-American women made giant leaps of their own at NASA, beginning in 1961.  Based on the true story, Taraji P. Henson, Octavia Spencer and Janelle Monae play mathematicians Katherine G. Johnson, Dorothy Vaughn and Mary Jackson, as these three women help trailblaze the way for civil rights with their outstanding contributions at the nation’s leading space center.   Director Theodore Melfi and the actresses emote the women’s struggles against institutional racism and related setbacks, along with their forward-thinking ingenuity, led by Johnson who is the lone black woman on Al Harrison’s (Kevin Costner) high profile team.  This inspiring film – nominated for three Oscars, including Best Picture - flies with all the right beats and reaches for – and catches - the stars.    

 

League of Their Own.jpg

Dottie Hinson, Kit Keller and the Rockford Peaches - “A League of Their Own” (1992) – World War II called a nation of young American men to duty, including baseball players.  This, however, did not prevent sports fans from watching professional baseball, because a collection owners and female athletes formed the All-American Girls Professional Baseball League in 1943.  In a dramatized story about a real baseball league, the talented cast - led by Geena Davis, Lori Petty, Rosie O’Donnell, Madonna - showcase the competitive spirit and fun of America’s pastime in, arguably, the most celebrated female sports film in movie history.  Not only does director Penny Marshall offer some hilarious moments from the tough-as-nails duo of Doris (O’Donnell) and Mae (Madonna), the Rockford Peaches head coach (Tom Hanks) and lead scout (Jon Lovitz), but she does not shy away from revealing the sexism that the Peaches endured, along with game time dramatics and tension between sisters Dottie (Davis) and Kit (Petty).  All the on and off-field moments feel earnest and authentic, and when the movie ends, you will declare, “We need a sequel. Let’s play two!”

 

Miracle Worker.JPG

Annie Sullivan and Helen Keller – “The Miracle Worker” (1962) – Annie (Anne Bancroft) and Helen (Patty Duke) do not really work well as a teacher-student team.  Quite the opposite, actually.  Six-year-old Helen is blind and deaf, and she physically and emotionally resists Annie’s persistent attempts to communicate with her.   Their struggle pours off the screen and douses the viewer with anxiety for a majority the film’s 1 hour and 46 minutes, as Annie truly needs to become a miracle worker to explain words, concepts and very basic manners to a lost child with no palatable points of reference.  Quite frankly, the exhausting, 10-minute dining room table scene alone should garner Annie a medal.  Well, the Academy certainly noticed, because Bancroft and Duke won the Best Actress and Best Supporting Actress Oscars in 1963.  This film depicts a portion of Helen’s real-life story, and she went on to earn a Bachelor of Arts degree, so yes, Annie Sullivan and Helen are both miracle workers.   

 

Mustang.jpg

Lale, Nur, Selma, Ece, and Sonay – “Mustang” (2015) – Raised by their grandmother, five sisters (played by Gunes Sensoy, Doga Zeynep Doguslu, Tugba Sunguroglu, Elit Iscan, and Ilayda Akdogan) harmless play in the Black Sea with some boys, but their uncle responds with massively excessive repercussions in a movie which intimately captures the struggle between child and adult and freedom of expression versus oppression more than any other film in recent memory.  The girls respond to their repressive new environment in varying ways, while writer/director Deniz Gamze Erguven organically communicates the involved bonds of sisterhood and heartbreaking moments within figurative and literal enclosed spaces.  The Academy rightly nominated “Mustang” for the Best Foreign Language Film of the year.

 

9 to 5.jpg

Judy Bernly, Violet Newstead and Doralee Rhodes – “9 to 5” (1980) – “The Empire Strikes Back” was 1980’s highest grossing movie, but “9 to 5” – which addresses unfair workplaces for women in a comedic and empowering way – was the second highest.  In the film, Judy (Jane Fonda), Violet (Lily Tomlin) and Doralee (Dolly Parton) plot against their boss, Franklin Hart (Dabney Coleman), after years of his repeated sexist slights.  All three leads are especially good and very likable, and Fonda delivers the biggest surprise with her understated performance.   The film struck a chord with audiences, especially women impacted by discriminating office environments of their own, and one can only imagine theatres bursting into laughter and emotional release, when Doralee threatens Mr. Hart by saying, “I’m gonna get that gun of mine and change you from a rooster to a hen in one shot.”

 

Sense.jpg

Elinor, Marianne, Margaret, and Mother Dashwood – “Sense and Sensibility” (1995) – Due to British legal complications, Mr. Dashwood’s (Tom Wilkinson) estate is passed to his male son from his first marriage and not to his wife (Gemma Jones) and daughters (Emma Thompson, Kate Winslet and Emile Francois) from his second.  For the Dashwood women, in addition to missing their late husband/father, they also lost their financial comforts.  In director Ang Lee’s adaption of Jane Austin’s novel, the four women rally together and support one another, despite their dissimilar personalities, especially between the reserved Elinor (Thompson) and idealistic Marianne (Winslet).  Displaced to a cottage in the country, the film basks in topnotch performances and a tightrope act of finding love, when pleasantries, obligations and duties usually trump passion.   Nominated for seven Oscars – including Thompson and Winslet for Best Actress and Best Supporting Actress, respectively – it makes perfect sense to embrace this picture again, 23 years after its initial release.

 

Thelma and Louise.jpg

Thelma Dickinson and Louise Sawyer - “Thelma & Louise” (1991) – Thelma (Geena Davis) and Louise (Susan Sarandon) embark on a weekend road trip, and their travels begin extremely well, as they smile and sing “The way you do the things you do” in a green Thunderbird convertible. On the first evening of their vacation, however, they suddenly begin humming an extremely different tune, because misfortune and bad judgment collide with their previously-merry plan.  Director Ridley Scott, Davis and Sarandon capture a transformational journey with these two women, who have been living with chauvinism and economic oppression that they release on the road in the American desert.  Nominated for six Oscars, including two Best Actress nominations for Davis and Sarandon, this film moves the needle on female empowerment, because Thelma’s and Louise’s methods do not abide by traditional manners. 

 

Jeff – a member of the Phoenix Critics Circle – has penned film reviews since 2008 and graduated from ASU’s Walter Cronkite School of Journalism.  Follow Jeff and the Phoenix Film Festival on Twitter @MitchFilmCritic and @PhoenixFilmFest, respectively.

 

Black Panther - Movie Review by Monte Yazzie

Black Panther.jpg

Black Panther

 

Director: Ryan Coogler

Starring: Chadwick Boseman, Michael B. Jordan, Lupita Nyong’o, Danai Gurira, Martin Freeman, Daniel Kaluuya, Letitia Wright, Sterling K. Brown, Angela Bassett, Forest Whitaker, and Andy Serkis

 

There are more than a few moments in director Ryan Coogler’s superhero feature “Black Panther” when the real trials and injustices of the past converge with the fictional lives of the characters living in this superhero universe, it displays a world unlike any world portrayed in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. It’s refreshing, unexpected, and altogether necessary considering the divided world we live in today. “Black Panther” imbeds culture and tradition into every single frame of the film, displaying a Black world filled with rich environments, conflicted characters, and complicated scenarios all surrounding and socially aware of race, gender, social class, and history.

 

T’Challa (Chadwick Boseman), the new King of Wakanda, returns home to the technologically advanced hidden African nation to oversee rule. However, T’Challa quickly realizes that rule in his country comes with obstacles, many from factions within Wakanda. The country has a material called vibranium that allows them to develop technology that far exceeds anyone else in the world. This brings two enemies into the conflict, both wanting to utilize Wakanda’s resource for their own deadly plans.

 

Mr. Coogler, who brought back the Rocky Balboa saga with the standout “Creed”, composes a Marvel film that has all the familiar and cliché sequences one would expect in a comic book movie; fast cars, explosions, flying costumed characters with super capabilities are all on clear display. However, it also does something wholly different from most recent Marvel films; it explores the mythology of a culture that thrives with tradition and emphasizes its uniqueness in the modern world; the wardrobe, the ceremonies, the design of Wakanda all have strong visions influenced by African and African American imagery. It’s beautiful every time it’s on display.

 

The film understands the power of gender, utilizing female characters that not only support the male hero at the forefront but form the foundation for everything that T’Challa stands for. By his side, saving his life a few times throughout the film, is General Okoye (Danai Gurira) who is a strong, tough-as-nails woman that is the definition of fearless. Ms. Gurira has an exceptional presence in the film. Making the gadgets is T’Challa’s sister Shuri (Letitia Wright), a smart young woman who knows exactly how to put her older brother in check. Ms. Wright is simply fantastic, a star turning role for the actress. Nakia (Lupita Nyong’o) is a spy who challenges T’Challa in understanding the role he has as King of Wakanda. To call her the “love interest” is a disservice to the role that she really encompasses. Nakia, played with passion by Ms. Nyong’o, is the connection to the real world, to the world that still struggles, to the people that still fight for the most basic human rights.

 

Mr. Coogler separates his film from the Marvel Universe in another way by composing a villain that actually feels threatening, one that feels more than just another bad guy looking to destroy the world. Erik Killmonger is operating with a purpose, one that is directly connected to the past that helped in building Wakanda and completely influenced by the future that T’Challa is trying to protect. It’s great character development for Killmonger because it comes with realistic complexities such as the mistreatment of African American’s throughout history and the hope for a future where oppression will finally be challenged. This is the best composed Marvel film villain in some time.  Michael B. Jordan exudes confidence and has an intensity that shines when his character comes face to face with the Black Panther. Assisting Mr. Jordan’s character is another steady performance from Andy Serkis who is having all kinds of fun chewing the scenery as Ulysses Klaue.

 

Race is of great significance in this film. It’s the pivotal narrative element that separates “Black Panther” from the other Marvel films because it is handled in such a multifaceted manner. We are provided a film that understands the affect of the past, how history has treated a people in unfair and unjust ways, and how the abuse of power has threatened an entire cultural way of life. That alone makes any film thrive with a quality that resonates far beyond the barriers of any genre, the fact that a superhero film embodies this element on a mainstream platform is a wonderful, and important, achievement.

 

Monte’s Rating

4.25 out of 5.00

Black Panther - Movie Review by Ben Cahlamer

Black Panther.jpg

Black Panther

 

Directed by Ryan Coogler

Written by Ryan Coogler and Joe Robert Cole

Based on ‘Black Panther’ by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby

Starring Chadwick Boseman, Michael B. Jordan, Lupita Nyong’o, Danai Gurira, Martin Freeman, Daniel Kaluuya, Letitia Wright, Winston Duke, Angela Bassett, Forest Whitaker, Andy Serkis

 

I don’t think it’s a big secret at this point that I am not a fan of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. I didn’t grow up on comic books, so for me, I’m not invested in this universe. What is interesting is that after seventeen movies, I have discovered that the stories follow fantasy films that I enjoyed as a kid, because the themes they explored are carried within the MCU. Never have those themes congealed as well as they did in Ryan Coogler’s “Black Panther,” the eighteenth film in the MCU, which opens in theaters tomorrow.

 

As the film opens, we are treated to a question about how the Wakandans came to be. It gives rise to Vibranium and explains the birth of the first Black Panther, who united the five warring tribes, forming the nation of Wakanda. Years later, the sitting king of Wakanda, T’Chaka (John Kani) is killed, forcing his son, T’Challa (Chadwick Boseman) to ascend to the throne as the rightful heir. A secret from the past threatens the kingdom and the world.

 

Mr. Coogler (“Fruitvale Station,” “Creed”) brings a very assured and confident hand in his directorial turn, something that I didn’t think I needed in a Marvel film, and yet, I appreciated it. The key to the film is in its script, which Mr. Coogler co-wrote with Joe Robert Cole.

 

They managed to create a microcosm not only within the movie, but within the Marvel Cinematic Universe as well. The brilliance in the story is that it is self-contained and yet, it is steeped in culture and tradition. Lightning quick dialog touches on numerous themes of isolation, oppression and repression to the forefront with a ferocity that has been lacking in other Marvel films.

 

Mr. Boseman does an amazing job as he is called upon to fight in a ceremonial challenge to his crown in addition to inhabiting the Black Panther personae. Family is very critical to the Wakandans. Standing by his side are his mother, Ramonda (Angela Bassett), his younger sister Shuri (Letitia Wright) and his closest friend, W’Kabi (Daniel Kaluuya, “Get Out”). Loyal to the crown is Okoye (Danai Gurira), the leader of the Dora Milaje, the all-female Special Forces. Her athleticism was called upon several times throughout the film, but her ability to emote through her eyes said a lot about her performance and the character.

 

Forest Whitaker played Zuri, an elder statesman in Wakanda, a role we’ve seen him play time and again. It is his diplomatic approach to a role that gives him the gravitas to approach this role and lends itself well to the traditions of Wakanda. Martin Freeman has an extended role as Everett K. Ross. He is an effective addition to the cast, helping to build intrigue and adventure into the narrative.

 

Michael B. Jordan plays Killmonger, who is hell-bent on reclaiming his rightful place in Wakandan society. I was impressed with his determination as Adonis Creed and his fierce nature is on display in this role. However, I thought his aggressiveness diminished the impact of the character, but I am convinced the he can play another villain. He wasn’t as cartoonish as Andy Serkis’s Ulysses Klaue. Serkis was the most animated character in the entire film. He presented a dangerous aspect, and while he grounded the film in the MCU reality, his character felt out of place when the entire film is considered.

 

Visually, the film is stunning. Rachel Morrison’s cinematography carries the largess of the Wakandans, while the effects teams created an environment fit for a king. The real heartbeat of this film is its wonderful score from Ludwig Goransson. From subtle drum beats to full, action-packed themes, it carries the heritage of a society ready to burst forth and to put itself on the world’s stage.

 

Despite my praise, I initially found the film to be “flat” as it emulated the espionage-driven films of the 1970s with a hint of “Wonder Woman,” a little bit of “Lion King,” and some small measure of Shakespeare. It was as I started to break the film down that I realized the subliminal power of what this film means to the Marvel Cinematic Universe. I understand its importance to not only the universe it inhabits, but the symbolism of our own tribes coming together as one. Perhaps it is because of its serious nature that I still struggle with the film itself.

 

2.75 out of 4 stars

 

Early Man - Movie Review by Ben Cahlamer

Early Man.jpg

Early Man

 

Directed by Nick Park

Screenplay by Mark Burton and James Higginson

Story by Mark Burton and Nick Park

Starring Eddie Redmayne, Tom Hiddleston, Maisie Williams, Timothy Spall

 

One of my favorite lines in a film has to be when William Shatner quips to someone “I guess irony can be pretty ironic sometimes.” It isn’t just that the line is hilarious. There is a lot of truth behind the comment. As I was thinking about Nick Park’s latest stop-motion animated film “Early Man” arriving in theaters tomorrow, the quote comes to mind.

 

Mr. Park along with his talented team of story tellers at Aardman has been delivering animated delights for many years. What started with “Wallace and Gromit” on the BBC transitioned into a chicken farm teeming with life to a sheep who doesn’t speak, but motions exceptionally well. Why, then, is a tribe of cavemen in the Stone Age funny let alone remotely appealing?

 

In part, it’s the dry, droll, ironic humor that Mr. Park and Mark Burton infused into their story, with the screenplay written by Mr. Burton and James Higginson. The humor is visually carried by the animation, but the voice cast really drive it home. In the Stone Age, the Earth is still cooling; volcanoes burp and spew lava. A valley, created by a meteorite impact is home to a caveman tribe. Led by Chief Bobnar (Timothy Spall), his tribe hunt rabbits. The most animated of his tribe is Dug (Eddie Redmayne). One night, their home is invaded by Lord Nooth (Tom Hiddleston), whence it is declared that the Stone Age has ended and the Bronze Age has begun. In a signature Aaardman moment, Dug is whisked away to the big city where he learns the truth about the caveman’s origins.

 

I am a huge fan of Aardman films. Their stories are short and to the point. They don’t waste a single animated cell while the characters are down to earth. It’s the theme of friendship, family and, ultimately trust that makes their stories so appealing. The animation is so pleasing to the eye as well. And, that’s where I struggled with “Early Man.” Much like other established content companies, Aardman has a formula that works for them. And I will always line up to see the animation. At some point though, risks must be taken. In this film, the risk is in Maisie Williams’ Goona, someone who Dug befriends during the course of the story. It was a nice touch to see Goona represent herself so strongly as a character.

 

Mr. Redmayne’s voice perfectly captured Dug’s innocence and his inquisitiveness. He played meek against Goona, but was able to defend his honor against Lord Nooth. Mr. Hiddleston was an excellent foil because he is the anti-hero; he sees no wrong in his antics, an irony that is not lost on this reviewer. Mr. Spall is subdued in this film, but that serves a purpose, which I think teaches an important lesson for younger children. The real MVP of the film is Hognob, Dug’s pet wild boar, played by Nick Park. I’ll let you see the movie to understand why.

 

Despite feeling like Aardman is stuck in their mold, they surprised me with characters and a story that reflect our own real-world situations. It might sound cliché, but the Geico insurance tagline “So easy, a caveman can do it” kept running through my head as the story unfolded. ABC tried to capitalize on this many years ago. There is irony in the fact that Aardman succeeded where ABC TV failed. But it’s probably not as funny as I think it is.

 

3 out of 4 stars

Black Panther - Movie Review by Jeff Mitchell

Black Panther.jpg

‘Black Panther’ cinematically and culturally advances the Marvel Universe

 

Directed by:  Ryan Coogler

Written by:  Ryan Coogler and Joe Robert Cole

Starring:  Chadwick Boseman, Michael B. Jordan, Lupita Nyong’o, Danai Gurira, Letitia Wright, Forest Whitaker, Angela Bassett, and Andy Serkis

 

 

“Black Panther” – “Toto, I have a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore.” – Dorothy (Judy Garland), “The Wizard of Oz” (1939)

 

Well, if Dorothy sat down and watched the latest Marvel installment, “Black Panther”, she would exclaim that Oz could not hold a candle to Wakanda, and Kansas has become a very distant memory.

 

Over the last 10 years, Marvel Studios has expanded wonder and broadened sci-fi horizons for comic book-movie audiences everywhere, especially with “Guardians of the Galaxy” (2014) and “Thor: Ragnarok” (2017).  These stories, however, were seeded in outer space, as directors James Gunn and Taika Waititi tapped into cosmic liberation and otherworldly delights.  Here, writer/director Ryan Coogler (“Fruitvale Station” (2013), “Creed” (2015)) and co-writer Joe Robert Cole extend that weightless, starry enchantment but on Planet Earth, and specifically, the nation of Wakanda located in Africa.

 

Even though Wakanda resembles a city built in the 24th century, complete with cone-shaped skyscrapers, monorails that ride on air and ships that hover and suddenly burst into flight, the film takes place in 2016, right after the events of “Captain America: Civil War”.  Prince T’Challa (Chadwick Boseman), whose alter ego is Black Panther, just lost his father via a terrorist attack in Austria, and he is – now - the rightful heir to the throne.  Although five tribes compromise the nation of Wakanda, a fearsome challenger M’Baku (Winston Duke) contests T’Challa’s right to be king.     

 

A more formidable opponent, however, soon travels from a faraway place to Wakanda to attempt to unseat T’Challa:  the chief antagonist of the picture, Erik Killmonger (Michael B. Jordan).   “Black Panther” is the third collaboration between Coogler and Jordan, and while the actor played protagonists in “Fruitvale Station” (2013) and “Creed” (2015), with Killmonger, this is a departure and - he said in a Feb. 14 interview - an enjoyable one.

 

“For me, it was liberating in a way.  It was fun to express a frustration that a lot of people may feel.” – Michael B. Jordan

 

As the picture unfolds – and like many great big screen villains - Killmonger’s motivation and rage are understood and empathized, but, of course, his methods in expressing his twisted course are suspect.  Deadly, in fact, as his name speaks for himself.  Killmonger projects danger during every on-screen moment.  Several times, Coogler’s camera captures a sly Killmonger smile, a moment before he steps into a potentially lethal fight.  Killmonger enjoys taking lives.  It is his fuel, but he does so in a sinister, matter-of-fact manner, as his pulse never reaches 40. 

 

Much of the action, however, does raise one’s pulse, as one set piece caroms in the close confines of a Korean casino and spills out into urban neon, but many entanglements reside in the previously peaceful Wakanda itself, due to this violent outsider’s massive disruption to T’Challa’s kingdom. 

 

This particular kingdom is also wonderfully constructed with African looks and customs.  Coogler, production designer Hannah Beachler and costume designer Ruth E. Carter seamlessly weave African themes into Wakanda, which result in marvelous mixes of culture and bright, rainbow fabric within a shiny, metallic and futuristic metropolis. Visually, Coogler and company present an on-screen world never seen before.  The only possible comparison is a conglomeration of “Buck Rogers” meets Xandar (an outer space city from “Guardians of the Galaxy” (2014)) meets an occasional glimpse of a futuristic Los Angeles from Spike Jonze’s “Her” (2013), but yes, Wakanda stands on its own.

 

T’Challa welcomes others to stand with him on his journey, as he is supported by a triad of strong women:  his sister Shuri (Letitia Wright), his ex-girlfriend Nakia (Lupita Nyong’o) and a fierce warrior Okoye (Danai Gurira).  Shuri and Okoye particularly stand out.  Shuri is an optimistic scientist and inventor, who could give Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) several lessons in technological breakthroughs and presents her latest findings to her brother in equal parts of extreme competence and humor, like Q from the James Bond films.  Okoye is just the opposite, a no-nonsense, battle-tested heroine.  With a fashion-forward baldheaded look and a stern demeanor, she would lay down her life for her king and kingdom without blinking.  

 

During a time when the absence of racial diversity in Hollywood films is rightly questioned, Marvel Studios and the “Black Panther” team move forward without blinking by offering a story revolving around a superhero of color.  Even though black exploitation films of the 1970s – like “Shaft” (1971) and “Uptown Saturday Night” (1974) – were hugely popular, it is difficult to fathom that a studio – 40 years ago - would pour millions and millions of dollars into a black superhero movie. 

 

On the set of “Good Morning America” during a Feb. 12 interview, a young, African-American girl asked Boseman, “Why is it important to you that there is a movie like this that represents black heroes?”

 

“It’s important, because I didn’t have this growing up,” Boseman said, “I just know what it’s going to mean to you when you see it.  It can give you a certain type of confidence, when you walk through the world, and it’ll also make people (who) look like you (be seen) in a different light and not (be judged) in a particular way.”

 

“Black Panther” not only breaks cultural boundaries, but also cinematic ones by delivering intricate Shakespearean intrigue between the leads and supporting characters, while revealing a celestial-like adventure on Earth.  Now, who knows if Coogler, Cole, Boseman, and Jordan thought about Oz during their youth, but in 2018, they proudly establish a spectacular adventure that Dorothy could not have dreamt. 

(3.5/4 stars)

 

Jeff – a member of the Phoenix Critics Circle – has penned film reviews since 2008 and graduated from ASU’s Walter Cronkite School of Journalism.  Follow Jeff and the Phoenix Film Festival on Twitter @MitchFilmCritic and @PhoenixFilmFest, respectively.

 

Fifty Shades Freed - Movie Review by Monte Yazzie

Fifty Shades Freed.jpg

Fifty Shades Freed

 

Director: James Foley

Starring: Dakota Johnson, Jamie Dornan, Eric Johnson, Eloise Mumford, Rita Ora, Luke Grimes, Victor Rasuk, Max Martini, Jennifer Ehle, Arielle Kebbel, and Marcia Gay Harden

 

At the end of “Fifty Shades Darker”, the sequel to the hit 2015 “Fifty Shades of Grey”, Anastasia Steele was being proposed to by Christian Grey. The couple, dealing with the kind of relationship complications that would spell doom for any new romance, haven’t grown much since their first meeting.  Anastasia received a job promotion along with some dangerous extra baggage brought on by her new relationship and Christian found a way to retain his submissive in order to satisfy his sexual proclivities, that’s really all that has happened.

 

In “Fifty Shades Freed”, the climax of the film trilogy, things only get more complicated for Mr. and Mrs. Grey. Marriage brings all the staggering concerns for this new couple in the first few months of their newfound status; threats of infidelity, struggles with living in each other's space, finding a new home, and the issue of planning for a family, it all happens to The Grey’s. Amidst all of this is the threat of a past foe, a jaded boss (Eric Johnson) of Anastasia who is looking for revenge.

 

Let’s get this out of the way first and foremost, this film is terrible. There is no clearer way to say it. Relationships are complicated because people are complicated. But that is also what makes relationships so magical. Two people with ambitions and dreams, with past’s that have shaped and molded them over the course of time, and each with their own ideas of what it means to love collide with one another and decide that they are going combine all these individualistic elements together in an attempt to find someone they can spend moments of their lives together with. It’s magic.

 

Aside from the fantasy of fast cars, big houses, private airplanes, expensive trips, and money that allows you to do and say anything you want, “Fifty Shades Freed” has characters that should be experiencing a wealth of fascinating and intriguing emotions, ones that would make a relationship that is founded primarily on sexuality erupt with passion and sexiness. This film never taps into any of those qualities, and even when it has the perfect opportunity to invest some kind of substance into the characters and relationship it instead takes unrealistic moves to sidestep the complexities that make relationships so unique.

 

It’s no spoiler that mature subject matter will be displayed on screen, people are going to indulge in sexual intercourse. Nudity has power in filmmaking, it has the power to paint characters with a range of motivations. For Dakota Johnson’s character, who is the only character to have nude scenes in the film, the nudity never offers her any kind of power or vulnerability. Instead she simply becomes part of the environment. That’s a major flaw because Dakota Johnson is a talented actress who deserves something better than what was provided here.

 

Yes, “Fifty Shades Freed” is fantasy, a nearly two-hour opportunity to escape the world you live in. However, that’s also the problem. Perhaps the most distressing aspect of “Fifty Shades Freed” lies in the current culture of our country. In a world where women have been deprived of power, stories about rich men getting whatever they want because of the family they belong to, the money they have accumulated, or the entitlement of power they believe they possess just feels idiotic. Take away the fast cars, the big house, the deep pockets, and Christian Grey isn’t Prince Charming, he is merely a creep. End of story.

 

Monte’s Rating

0.50 out of 5.00

Oscar Snubbed Part 2 by Monte Yazzie

image1.jpeg

Oscar Snubbed Part 2: Never Nominated

 

As we discussed a few weeks ago, there have been numerous films throughout history that have been snubbed for the Best Picture category for the Oscars. However, that’s not the only category that has seen its share of snubbed nominations. Best actor and actress, best director, and best cinematographer have seen their snubs as well. Here are a list of a few people who have never been nominated for an Oscar.

 

Best Actor

 

Jim Carrey - Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004)

 

If you haven’t had the chance to watch the documentary “Jim and Andy” which details the extent that Jim Carrey went into character to become Andy Kaufman in the film “Man on the Moon”, do yourself a favor and watch that immediately, it’s fascinating. Jim Carrey has never been nominated for an Oscar. Let that set in for a moment. Mr. Carrey, who got his start as a zany stand-up comedian, progressed into quite the actor during the late 90’s. In 2004 the actor gave his best performance in Michel Gondry’s film “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind”. Mr. Carrey combines a mix of different emotions in portraying a complicated character struggling to find his place in the world after the loss of love. It’s one of those performances that just gets better with time.

 

Best Actress

 

Marilyn Monroe - Some Like It Hot (1960)

 

Billy Wilder’s romantic comedy “Some Like It Hot” scored Oscar nominations for Jack Lemmon and Wilder but none for Marilyn Monroe who many times steals the show and matches verbal wits with Lemmon and Tony Curtis throughout the film. She is iconic in the role, beautiful and captivating while also being witty and humorous throughout the film. She owns every single scene, ultimately becoming the highlight of the film as history progressed. The movie has all the sensibilities of a Marx Brothers comedy highlighted by the charm and sexual confidence that Ms. Monroe embodied. Looking at the work that the actress produced in her career, it’s a shame that a nomination for Oscar never came her way.

 

Best Director

 

Brian De Palma - The Untouchables

 

Brian De Palma has never been nominated for an Academy Award…never!! That’s shocking. The director of “Carrie”, “Scarface”, “Carlito’s Way”, and “The Untouchables” has crafted some of the most impressive films in cinematic history but has never received a nomination for best director. While the director does dabble in entertainment that pushes horrific, grim, and outlandish qualities of genre filmmaking, which are easy reasons why Academy voters may have overlooked a nomination, “The Untouchables” checks all the bullets one would consider for a nomination. Sean Connery won the best supporting actor award for this film but Mr. De Palma was excluded from the nomination conversation. On the list of obvious snubs, Brian De Palma’s name is at the top of the list.

 

Best Cinematographer

 

Raoul Coutard - Breathless (1960)

 

Raoul Coutard may not be a recognizable name but the films he worked on revolutionized the methodologies for camera use in films. Mr. Coutard was the consistent collaborator for master filmmaker Jean-Luc Godard. The use of the handheld camera, the insistence of utilizing natural lighting, and the use of black and white photography would all come to define the practice of these skillsets in the French New Wave movement in film during the 1960’s. “Breathless” is one of the highlights of the French New Wave movement, one that Raoul Coutard had a large hand in curating. Mr. Coutard’s extensive films have an influence that is undeniable, which makes it all the more disappointing he was never recognized for an Oscar.

The 15:17 to Paris - Movie Review by Jeff Mitchell

15 17 to Paris.jpg

‘The 15:17 to Paris’, a less than ordinary trip about an extraordinary story

 

Directed by:  Clint Eastwood

Written by:  Dorothy Blyskal

Starring:  Spencer Stone, Alek Skarlatos, Anthony Sadler, Jenna Fischer, and Judy Greer

 

“The 15:17 to Paris” – “Heroes are ordinary people who make themselves extraordinary.” – Gerard Way

 

Spencer Stone, Alek Skarlatos and Anthony Sadler are 20-something Americans.  Friends since childhood, the three decided to travel to Europe on a semi-impromptu whim, but they never thought that their lives would be forever-changed during a Thalys train ride from Amsterdam to Paris. 

 

Specifically, the 15:17 on Aug. 21, 2015.

 

Director Clint Eastwood tells Spencer’s, Alek’s and Anthony’s story on this particular train ride, but also their personal tales outside of the 15:17 in a most unique way:  Without big screen acting experience, the three men actually play themselves and recreate the events on that fateful August day.    

 

Eastwood’s vision is a bold and noble one, but as the film plays out over 1 hour and 34 minutes, the narrative is noticeably and deeply flawed.  Not necessarily because of the first-time actors, but unfortunately, there is not enough story to stretch over an entire feature film.  Other visual avenues like a 20-minute news segment or a 45-minute documentary seem like more appropriate platforms.   

 

Before Eastwood transports the audience to an Amsterdam train platform, he sends us to Sacramento in 2005.  

 

Spencer, Alek and Anthony were preteens or barely teens back then, and child actors William Jennings, Bryce Gheisar and Paul-Mikel Williams play them, respectively.  Although these scenes – which comprise a surprisingly lengthy 40 minutes or so – transpire in the 21st century, they feel like the 1950s, an arguably more innocent, wholesome time when the Internet was not a thought and moms sent their boys outside to play at 8:00am and added, “Be home for dinner at 5.”

 

These scenes radiate some “Stand by Me” (1986) vibes, but without any edginess or drama.  When the boys are not playing war with paintball guns or expounding on their 13-year-old worldviews, they dive into relatively harmless trouble.  Their only conflicts are self-induced, as they stand in school hallways sans hall passes, back talk in gym class or exhibit general apathy.  That apathy transmits off the screen though, as these long stretches have all the cinematic excitement of lukewarm oatmeal. 

 

The only reprieves from the monotony are the gently humorous moments with various teachers or faculty (Tony Hale, Thomas Lennon) who seem to possess other life distractions that impede their understanding of the average junior high student.  Actually, a couple flash-forwards to the 15:17 do also briefly pop on the screen, but they haphazardly appear and distract, rather than add insight or intrigue, as this critic wondered, “Okay, when do the events on the train actually start?”

 

The answer is: 1 hour and 14 minutes into the picture, but not before we see Spencer, Alek and Anthony – in the second act - as adults, attempting to make lives for themselves.  Actually, Spencer is the main focus, as he joins the U.S. Air Force.  Alek enlists in the U.S. Army National Guard and serves a tour in Afghanistan, while Anthony formulates his next move in California. 

 

Some of these moments garner vital importance for the film’s final act, but much of this time feels like filler, especially during the guys’ trip to Europe.  Now, Spencer and Anthony do tour a couple iconic locales in Italy before joining Alek in Amsterdam, but their travels oddly and figuratively feel pedestrian through the beautiful sites.  

 

For some reason, Dorothy Blyskal’s screenplay does not prioritize deeper insight into their personas, as Spencer’s, Alek’s and Anthony’s exchanges do not rise above typical conversations during anyone’s own vacation. 

 

Declarations like “Let’s go get some food or something” or “I’m about to go to sleep” do not exactly channel inspiring cinema, as their European holiday might evoke feelings of sitting through two hours of your cousin’s home movies during a forgettable Thanksgiving dinner. 

 

The moments on the train, however, raise different tones, as a Moroccan man attempts to cause lethal havoc in tightly-closed spaces.  Eastwood, Spencer, Alek, and Anthony recreate these events with visceral realism and angst that might have audiences squirming in their seats.  In that way, “The 15:17 to Paris” does an admirable job of honoring these brave men (along with Chris Norman, a Brit on the same train) and their quick actions that placed them in the direct line of fire and violence.

 

Spencer, Alek, Anthony, and Chris truly are heroes, and moviegoers will most likely feel very thankful to know their story, but it will take a lot of patience and deep breaths to get through a less than ordinary picture about these extraordinary men.  

(1.5/4 stars)

 

Jeff – a member of the Phoenix Critics Circle – has penned film reviews since 2008 and graduated from ASU’s Walter Cronkite School of Journalism.  Follow Jeff and the Phoenix Film Festival on Twitter @MitchFilmCritic and @PhoenixFilmFest, respectively.

 

Permission - Movie Review by Ben Cahlamer

Permission.jpg

Permission

 

Directed by Brian Crano

Written by Brian Crano

Starring Rebecca Hall, Dan Stevens, Morgan Spector, David Joseph Craig, Gina Gershon, Jason Sudeikis

 

Although they are not defined as bank holidays, where the federal government closes its offices, every month in the Gregorian Calendar has a holiday associated with it. February, the shortest month of the year, is associated with Valentine’s Day, the celebration of love. With just a bit of digging, I discovered that the holiday is named for a Saint Valentine, a 3rd-century Roman saint who was martyred. It is the martyrdom aspect of his relatively unknown history, that I approach Brian Crano’s “Permission.”

 

Starring Rebecca Hall as Anna and Dan Stevens as Will, they are two twenty-somethings living in New York City. They have been in a long term relationship as Will, a furniture maker by trade is working on refurbishing a brownstone, their dream home. She is attending Julliard studying music theory, and she is on the cusp of graduating. They have been in their relationship for so long, that they don’t know anyone else. At dinner one night, Hale (David Joseph Craig) suggests at dinner one night that they should seek out other relationships to see if their relationship is as strong as they believe it is.

 

The beauty in Brian Crano’s script is its brutal honesty as each partner seeks out another relationship. The story is very sex-centric as they focus on finding what makes the other tick and it was amusing to see who they each pick. There is a perversion about their choices and about the way they interact with the various characters in the film.

 

Despite a search for spice in their relationship, Mr. Crano’s story felt very static. We know to an extent where the film will end up based on the opening frames. The performances salvage a lot of the story and that’s because of the actors’ commitment to their craft. I first encountered Ms. Hall, who also produced the film, in “Christine.” She has such a dominating personality and it was hilarious to watch her release her inhibitions, especially against Dane (Francois Arnaud). On the other hand, as Mr. Stevens explores his desires, we find him less enthused to do so. That is until he encounters Lydia played by the amazing Gina Gershon. Though I found their relationship more believable of the two, Mr. Stevens played the role by-the-numbers, which makes the reveal at the end of the film less convincing. His performance was very convincing though and I admire his desire to stay true to himself.

 

There is a parallel story concerning Hale and his partner, Reece (Morgan Spector) as they go through their own challenges. Mr. Craig’s interactions with Jason Sudeikis were the least uncomfortable parts of the film, and offered some measure of hope, which the film needed. Mr. Sudeikis is funny in any situation, but it was his tender and dramatic side that fit so well into this cast.

 

It is easy to refer to this film as ‘soft porn,’ which it is not. It is however, humorously perverted and Ms. Hall and Mr. Stevens work overtime to make it all stick. The self-important nature of the story doesn’t allow it to come full-circle, but it’s the thought that counts, right?

 

2 out of 4 stars.

 

Peter Rabbit - Movie Review by Ben Cahlamer

Peter Rabbit.jpg

Peter Rabbit

 

Directed by Will Gluck

Screenplay by Will Gluck and Rob Lieber, based on “Peter Rabbit” by Beatrix Potter

Starring Rose Byrne, Domhnall Gleeson, Sam Neill, Daisy Ridley, Elizabeth Debicki, Margot Robbie, James Cordon

 

There is something to be said for the anti-hero archetype. As an audience, we know that their intentions are good, even if they need to push someone out of the way to achieve their objective.  We relate to these characters because we inherently believe that we are better people; that we wouldn’t encounter the same trials or tribulations. Yet, when push comes to shove, we know deep down that we would do the same thing if we had to.

 

We just don’t think about it consciously.

 

Will Gluck’s latest film, “Peter Rabbit” is the epitome of the anti-hero. Featuring James Cordon in the titular role, Peter and his family live in the countryside, inhabiting a rabbit hole next to the McGregor estate and Bea (Rose Byrne), an artist-in-the-making. An ongoing feud between Peter and the elder McGregor over the McGregor’s bounteous garden results in misfortune, bringing the younger McGregor, Thomas (Domhnall Gleeson) in to the picture. The overworked and overwrought Thomas brings a new kind of mischief to Peter and his family.

 

The use of live-action background and 3D characters has been tried before with mixed results. Mr. Gluck expertly weaves the two together, making for a pleasing look throughout the film. The film feels a lot like a short take on the classic “Home Alone,” but there’s a more mature storyline as Peter realizes he is not the injured party, and that’s what makes him the perfect anti-hero. On the flipside, the script by Mr. Gluck and Rob Lieber pits one anti-hero against another in Mr. Gleeson’s Thomas. Thomas’ justification is preservation of his land and Bea is all that stands between sanity and total annihilation.

 

Fortunately, Peter has the benefit of having three angels on his side, in the form of his three sisters, Cottontail (voiced by Daisy Ridley), Flopsy (voiced by Margot Robbie) and Mopsy (voiced by Elizabeth Debicki). There is a lot on in-fighting between the siblings, but it serves a purpose as Peter works to solve their dilemma. Peter’s strongest ally is his cousin, Benjamin Bunny (voiced by Matt Lucas), who I shared an affinity for. He was the voice of reason amidst the chaos, even if no one wanted to listen to what he had to say, least of all Peter. The story works through the pettiness of their differences and Peter and Thomas try to one-up the other in their gamesmanship.

 

It leads to disaster, and inevitably a song and dance number, because it’s cute to see dancing, talking animals sashay across the screen. The biggest problem that the story encounters is the fact that there are two anti-heroes. They don’t necessarily cancel each other out, but their antics do. As with any children’s story, it inevitably leads to a reconciliation. As fun as it was to see Mr. Gleeson continue to explore his lighter comedic side, it came off as being a bit over-the-top. But, gosh, do I want to see more of it, just not as an anti-hero.

 

“Peter Rabbit,” based on the children’s series of books by Beatrix Potter is a fun romp. It’s a bit more mature than I was expecting, which I enjoyed. It should appeal to families, but a lot of it might go over the heads of younger children.

 

3 out of 4 stars.

The Insult - Movie Review by Jeff Mitchell

The Insult.jpg

‘The Insult’ offers more than words

 

Written and directed by:  Ziad Doueiri

Starring:  Adel Karam, Kamel El Basha, Camille Salameh, Christine Choueiri, Rita Hayek, and Diamand Bou Abboud

 

“The Insult” – “Lebanon is a peculiar place, so bicultural, it goes along with you.  There is a Western influence, an Eastern influence.  Most people are fluctuating between those identities.” – Director Ziad Doueiri

 

Tony (Adel Karam) and Yasser (Kamel El Basha) productively work and fruitfully live within the vibrant heartbeats of Beruit, Lebanon.   Tony owns a busy auto repair shop and enjoys his happy marriage with Shirine (Rita Hayek), who is pregnant with their first child.  Yasser is a hardworking construction company foreman and meticulously hones his chosen profession while contently married to his supportive wife, Manal (Christine Choueiri).  

 

During an ordinary day, Tony’s and Yasser’s paths suddenly intersect via a fairly harmless – but real - oversight, one that can be resolved through a cordial conversation.  Their introduction, however, is quite the opposite.  Caustic, abrasive and uncompromising.  All of the initial hostility emanates from Tony towards Yasser, who shows more patience, probably grown from a couple more decades of navigating through life’s interpersonal conflicts. 

 

Although, Yasser’s patience does wear thin.  They trade insults, which then escalate in ways neither one could have imagined. 

 

“The Insult” – nominated for a Best Foreign Language Film Oscar - was created through the thoughtful imagination of writer/director Ziad Doueiri, who was born and raised in Lebanon, but left for the U.S. to attend college during his country’s civil war.  Doueiri states some of Lebanon’s cultural complexities in the aforementioned quote, and he pits a current source of the nation’s tension into a harsh disagreement between two individuals. 

 

Tony is a Lebanese Christian and Yasser is a Palestinian immigrant. 

 

“Us vs. Them” conflicts can be explored within any nation’s sociological textures, and one does not need to look very far to witness tangible struggles in the United States.  Nevertheless, tensions in the Middle East can be volatile, and Doueiri explores a particularly combustible dynamic within Beruit in his effective character study with larger implications.

 

Karam and El Basha deliver convincing performances, as Tony carries a deep-seeded anger from some distant place that continues to seethe, and Yasser is unwillingly provoked by wounds from his past.  Now, viewing their argument in isolation, Doueiri and Karam portray Tony as an overstepping transgressor and clearly in the wrong, as audiences will immediately flock to Yasser’s defense.   At the outset, one might argue that blurred antagonist and protagonist roles would make a more gripping narrative, but Doueiri sows more complicated histories that help explain his characters’ current dispositions.  Hence, after the initial insults (where words can most certainly hurt), those lines do become fuzzy.    

 

The film’s high points lie with the onscreen exchanges between the leads and also with their respective wives.  In fact, Shirine delivers the film’s biggest truth, when she proclaims that Tony wants to burn everything down and is unwilling to turn the page…with Yasser and his own past.  As these interactions progress, Doueiri pulls an absolute need from the audience to grasp Tony’s and Yasser’s motivations, and a court case between the two becomes the eventual vehicle for their reveals during the movie’s second half.

 

The courtroom moments do contain some intrigue, two big surprises, and the competing lawyers (Camille Salameh and Diamand Bou Abboud) skillfully offer sharp arguments and rebuttals.  Abboud is particularly terrific as Yasser’s defense lawyer, Nadine, who is young, brilliant and trying her first case out of pure principle.  For each argument presented by the prosecution, Nadine seems to take a few seconds to process her next move and then delivers a successful counterpunch.  Like the moments between Tony and Yasser, battles between Nadine and the prosecution, Wajdi (Salameh), present compelling cinema. 

 

Speaking of compelling cinema, two specific Tony-Yasser confrontations reminded this critic of tense showdowns in an American western, but in these cases, sans the guns.  Within the spaces of the individual characters, the picture shines, but when Doueiri visually inserts bigger set pieces to nationalize Tony’s and Yasser’s dispute – like protests or television interviews – the movie loses momentum, as they feel a bit staged. 

 

These scenes are not necessary, and rather than occasionally explain the court case’s broader impacts, that additional time would arguably be better spent on more introspection when international cultural histories are weighed upon Tony, Yasser, their families and friends.   Still, Doueiri’s script and all of the performances provide an absorbing look at a “peculiar place” and its shared worldwide experiences of the human condition.

(3/4 stars)

 

Jeff – a member of the Phoenix Critics Circle – has penned film reviews since 2008 and graduated from ASU’s Walter Cronkite School of Journalism.  Follow Jeff and the Phoenix Film Festival on Twitter @MitchFilmCritic and @PhoenixFilmFest, respectively.

Oscar Snubbed by Monte Yazzie

Oscar 2018: Five Movies That Should Have Been Nominated

 

Oscars.jpg

The 2018 Oscar nominations were announced this week; as with most years the usually favorites make the cut but there are always some surprises. This is the Super Bowl for the film industry and film fans do the arduous task of picking their favorite film, actor, or director for who they think should win the big prize.

 

However, amidst all the films nominated over the course of history for the Academy Awards, there are always films that barely missed the cut, films that got the infamous snub. It’s interesting how history can treat a film, while some don’t always stand the test of time, some have aged far better than they were received at the original time of the their release. So, here are five films that should have been nominated for an Academy Award for Best Picture.

 

Five Films

 

 

Night of the Hunter (1955)

 

There are images in director Charles Laughton’s film “Night of the Hunter” that are simply iconic, breathtaking images have influenced cinema in ways that are too great to truly grasp. Peaked with a performance that is still as haunting and malicious as any performance today, Robert Mitchum’s character is the epitome of evil. Populated with romantic dramas in 1955, leaving no room for a film noir as dark as “Night of the Hunter”, the Best Picture winner would ultimately go to Delbert Mann’s “Marty”.

 

 

Zodiac.jpg

Zodiac (2004)

 

Director David Fincher’s atmospheric, unnerving film “Zodiac” is undeniably one of the best films of the last two decades. The film is a masterclass of procedure, with Fincher quietly filling the frames with nuanced performances and plotting the chase for a serial killer with deliberate attention to the mood of the 1970’s and the hysteria caused by the media. While it may not have been enough to overtake Clint Eastwood’s “Million Dollar Baby”, it’s a film that gets considerably better as time continues to age it.

 

 

The Long Goodbye (1973)

 

It was a tough year sneaking into the Best Picture category in 1973, with heavyweights like “The Exorcist” and “Cries and Whispers” filling the ballot and the winner “The Sting” maintaining much praise with an all-star cast that included Robert Redford and Paul Newman in leading roles, I like to think that there is still room for Robert Altman’s detective story “The Long Goodbye”. Lead by a stellar performance from Elliot Gould, Altman weaves an impressive story that restructures the characteristics of the crime genre.

 

City Lights.jpg

City Lights (1931)

 

Charlie Chaplin’s influence on comedic performance is legendary. The film’s Chaplin produced over his career are lauded for numerous reasons, whether it’s performance, political satire, or it’s insights into human nature, Chaplin’s catalog is a must watch for any film fan. While all of Chaplin’s work could be categorized as his best, “City Lights” for me is the crowning achievement of the Little Tramp’s career. While Chaplin was more than likely well ahead of his time, it’s a shame that this film wasn’t recognized for its monumental achievement.

 

Once Upon a Time in the West (1968)

 

Sergio Leone’s spaghetti western “Once Upon a Time in the West” is one of the best western films of all time. While it’s a shame that western genre films like “Rio Bravo” and “The Searchers” were overlooked for Best Picture nominations, “Once Upon a Time in the West” seemed to have the best chance considering “Oliver!” was the winner of Best Picture in 1968. Leone would again be snubbed sixteen years later for the film “Once Upon a Time in America”.

 

The Final Year - Movie Review by Jeff Mitchell

Final Year.jpg

‘The Final Year’ fills the screen with grace and a ticking clock

 

Directed by:  Greg Baker

Starring:  Barack Obama, Samantha Power, Ben Rhodes, and John Kerry

 

“The Final Year” – If a doctor said that you had one year left to live, what would you do?    Just before that moment, you might believe that time is a forever-companion, and after it, realize that it is an extraordinarily precious commodity.  Whether attempting to experience previously-evasive fruits of life, tether distant relationships or write the next great American novel, the clock is ticking.  It is counting down, impossible to ignore.

 

Conversely, a high school student enters a scholastic institution with a clearly-defined, four-year construct, and even though an individual’s path via freshman to senior is unknown, the timetable – barring some rare expediency or lag in studies – is set.  Four years.  Of course, some kids could be plagued by a condition called senioritis, defined by Google as a supposed affliction of students in their final year of high school or college, characterized by a decline in motivation or performance.  You know, a time when movies, the mall, parties, and/or a three-hour discussion about the future, music or relationships seem more important than a book report due on a random Wednesday.

 

“The Final Year” does not cover a patient’s last year to live, nor does it chronicle a 17-year-old’s senior year, but this documentary prominently features a ticking clock and the end of a four-year construct, actually an eight-year one. 

 

Director Greg Barker gives an insider’s look into the last year of Barack Obama’s presidency, and the 44th President of the United States does appear on Barker’s camera.  Secretary of State John Kerry does as well, but the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power and Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes are the film’s two prominent guides on this White House/worldwide tour.  

 

Power - an altruistic, confident voice on President Obama’s staff - operates with a calming presence, as she travels the globe and leverages opportunities for partnership.  While juggling – what seems like – 18-hour days, listening to concerns and speaking about humanitarian issues, she also finds herself sometimes negotiating with her preteen son. 

 

Baker’s role is more of a bureaucratic heavy.  He manages similar hours and travel schedules, as his intense persona gladly absorbs endless responsibilities.  He acts as a tireless defender for President Obama and a stressed taskmaster who first explores and then levels rocky, unknown terrain for him. 

 

President Obama, Secretary Kerry, Ambassador Power, and Advisor Rhodes all have agendas to accomplish, but during this final drive in 2016, Barker effectively captures their awareness of the limited time left.  The audience is aware too, while the aforementioned public servants strive for the impossible: to complete their work by January 2017, comprised of a never-ending list of tasks, concerns and events. 

 

“I feel like we should have a clock with the days counting down, because what we have set in motion…all of that is at stake.” – Samantha Power

 

What rings true in Barker’s picture is that any administration only has four or eight years to actively bestow its imprint.  The hope?  It will last beyond its time in power.  

 

The elephant in the room is the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election, and while Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump fight for the right to continue or reverse President Obama’s imprint, Power and Rhodes occasionally glance at a television or casually mention the heated contest, as it preys as a source of looming anxiety.  In 2018, of course, we know the election outcome, but not only does the film provide insight into the inner workings of the White House, but it accurately operates as a microcosm of how democrats felt in 2016.  This also includes the reaction on election night, which will be a relived-nightmare for liberals and a joyous I told you so for conservatives.  

 

Thankfully, “The Final Year” truly avoids petty politics, name calling, ugly partisanship, and negative bile from both sides of the aisle.  This is not a Trump-bashing movie.  Instead, it rises above fray – at least on camera – with a nearly constant stream of grace.  No matter how one feels about President Obama’s administration, there is no denying its grace, led by the man at the top from January 2009 to January 2017, and Baker’s film surely captures that last year…along with a ticking clock.

(3/4 stars)

 

Jeff – a member of the Phoenix Critics Circle – has penned film reviews since 2008 and graduated from ASU’s Walter Cronkite School of Journalism.  Follow Jeff and the Phoenix Film Festival on Twitter @MitchFilmCritic and @PhoenixFilmFest, respectively.

 

 

 

A Look at Oscar's Best Picture Nominees by Ben Cahlamer

And, the Best Picture Oscar nominees are . . .

 

Oscars.jpg

Now that the initial reaction to this year’s Academy Award-nominations is over, and has had a chance to breathe, it is as good a time as any to work our way through the nominees. I’m not going to use words like ‘snub’. That’s not the intent of the Oscars and I don’t see someone or a film not getting a nomination as a validation of their work. That’s what the box office is for. Instead, this is a chance for the industry to recognize their peers, to celebrate accomplishments and achievements and to take a break for an evening.

Guillermo del Toro’s The Shape of Water leads the pack with 13 nominations

As Hollywood prepares for its evening of glitz and glam, we’re going to take a look at the films that did get nominated and why they are worthy of being nominated for the 90th Academy Awards ceremony.

Call Me By Your Name.jpg

Call Me by Your Name – in my conversations with colleagues and movie goers, this is probably the most divisive film. Luca Guagadino’s film is a coming-of-age story, but it is much, much more. It is in theaters now, and I would encourage you to check it out. It was number three on my Top 10 of 2017.

Darkest Hour – Joe Wright’s film was the fourth in 2017 to feature Winston Churchill and the third to have a role in the Dunkirk Campaign. It features Gary Oldman in his Golden Globe-winning role as the vociferous military strategist. As it rolls back into theaters, it is worth a look.

Dunkirk – Christopher Nolan’s film about the Dunkirk Campaign is one of the most talked-about films in this year’s Best Picture pool. It is a story told from three vantage points, using sound as its guide. It took the summer by storm and is now out on Blu-ray, Ultra High Definition Blu-ray and on all the major VOD platforms. With all of this in mind, if you missed it last summer, take some time to catch it in theaters when it returns in a few weeks. It has the second most nominations this year with eight.

Get Out.jpg

Get Out – Jordan Peel’s nightmarish dark comedy took the world by storm early last year with its strong social commentary. Daniel Kaluuya was nominated for his performance, Jordan Peel was nominated for his direction and for his screenplay. It is also on home video now, but it should be seen with a crowd (or a bunch of friends.)

Lady Bird – The other coming-of-age story, indie darling Greta Gerwig’s directorial debut is sensational. Saoirse Ronan is incredible in her Academy Award-nominated turn. The film is still in theaters and is worthy of your time.

Phantom Thread – The film that marks Daniel-Day Lewis’s final role is absolutely beautiful. Paul Thomas Anderson’s peak into a fashionable dressmaker’s life is pure joy to watch unfold. It’s not for everyone, so take my commentary with a grain of salt, but it’s production is exquisite. It expanded this weekend to theaters across the nation.

The Post.jpg

The Post – The story is simple, the history is complicated, but Steven Spielberg’s look at The Washington Post’s role in the Pentagon Papers scandal is a rousing story for our modern times.

The Shape of Water – Guillermo del Toro’s passionate story of love and acceptance is as futuristic as the look of the film. It is very adult and contemporary while remaining accessible. Claims to it being a take on The Creature from the Black Lagoon are somewhat unfair, but I understand why they’re being made. Despite this, it’s a unique love story worth checking out.

Three Billboards.jpg

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri – Martin McDonagh’s third film is probably the most divisive film out of this crop of Best Picture nominees. Its characters are strong willed and determined, their motives are less than pure and the cynicism runs high. It won the Screen Actors Guild Ensemble Award and Frances McDormand and Sam Rockwell have won multiple awards in their respective categories, leading up to their Academy Award-nominations. It was my number one film of 2017, it is still in theaters and, love it or hate it, it’s worth your time.

 

The 90th Annual Academy Awards presentation will air on ABC on Sunday, March 4th, 2018.

Maze Runer: The Death Cure - Movie Review by Ben Cahlamer

Maze Runner.jpg

Maze Runner: The Death Cure

 

Directed by Wes Ball

Screenplay by T.S. Nowlin, Based on The Death Cure by James Dashner

Starring Dylan O’Brien, Kaya Scoderlario, Thomas Brodie-Sangster, Nathalie Emmanuel, Giancarlo Esposito, Walton Goggins, Barry Pepper, Will Poulter, Patricia Clarkson

 

I find it a rather interesting exercise in thinking about why futuristic films aimed at young adults always paints a picture of fractured love or a dystopian future in which hope is the only way out. Films that I might think about from my childhood include Labyrinth, The Dark Crystal, The Never Ending Story, The Running Man, The Terminator . . . all three films present very adult themes, yet they are aimed specifically at young adults because at the time the films were released, we were future. The Maze Runner series is very much an amalgam of these films because they paint a fractured relationship in a dystopian future and the only way out is hope. And maybe just a little bit of team work.

Ah . . .  team work. As a species, even if the rich and the powerful ever gain complete control over our society, the collective mind can be stronger. And, in Wes Ball’s Maze Runner: The Death Cure, the collective works together to get through the Ivory Gates, so to speak. In this instance, a rag tag group of Maze Runners is on the lamb, and WCKD wants them.

We don’t necessarily know why they’re wanted, but we’re not expected to. As viewers, we’re expected to go along for the ride, which unfolds over two hours and 20 minutes. It’s a run to be sure, but Thomas (Dylan O’Brien), Newt (Thomas Brodie-Sangster) and Frypan (Dexter Darden) are up to the challenge. After a rather strong chase to find their colleague, Minho (Ki Hong Lee) doesn’t pan out, they begin a journey towards the Last City, where they learn Minho is being tested on for a Flare cure.

It is on this journey, where friends and foes band together in one final assault on the walls of the Last City. It was nice to see Will Poulter is a less serious, but more dramatic turn than his turn in Kathryn Bigelow’s Detroit. And, before you crucify me for turning my nose up at Detroit, I thought he did a magnificent job there. This role here required less aggression and more drama/action. It’s a nice turn for him. Walton Goggins also has a smaller role which I enjoyed, but felt it could have been expanded. Giancarlo Esposito is one of the highlights of the film in his role as Jorge, the leader of the resistance.

On the inside of the Last City is Teresa, who was Thomas’s love interest in the first Maze Runner film. She turned tables on the team to work with WCKD to find a cure. Running as security for the facility is Janson (Aidan Gillen). His role takes an interesting twist towards the end of the film, but ultimately felt unsatisfying. Patricia Clarkson continues to surprise me. She can walk on the screen and, much like Meryl Streep, there’s a grace and an elegance about her that the camera loves, and it fits her role here perfectly. Then the third act happens, and as I mentioned with the Janson role, as the walls of the Last City crumble, so does the third act.

The film looks great. The effects were convincing and the danger felt real. The action sequences keep the momentum of the film going. There were several homages to classic Sci-Fi films which I appreciated. But the characters, and ultimately the payoff, didn’t truly materialize because the story’s focus was solely on Thomas. It is his story after all. However, the length of the film affected how the other characters in the story interacted with him. It was as if they tried to tie up too many loose ends from the other films in the series.

In theaters and on IMAX screens now, Death Cure offers many of the same tropes as the films I mentioned earlier. It just doesn’t work as well as the other films.

2.5 out of 4

Small Town Crime - Movie Review by Jeff Mitchell

Small Town Crime.jpg

‘Small Town Crime’ is a middling curiosity

 

Written and directed by:  Eshom and Ian Nelms

Starring:  John Hawkes, Octavia Spencer, Anthony Anderson, and Robert Forster

 

 

“Small Town Crime” – “Well, I was born in a small town.  And I live in a small town.  Probably die in small town.”  -  John Mellencamp, “Small Town”

 

Mike Kendall (John Hawkes) lives in a small town, out west in the high desert, where blue skies reign, the ground sports varied shades of brown and snowcapped peaks hold court in the distance.  Writers/directors Eshom and Ian Nelms filmed outside Salt Lake City, Utah, but within the movie, the exact locale is not important.

 

Mike’s own well-being is not terribly important to him either.  An alcoholic, he trudges to several job interviews and deliberately fails in order to preserve a steady stream of unemployment checks to keep afloat and drink massive quantities of beer.  He has seen better days but is not even slightly interested in returning to them.  Drowning in regret remains Mike’s best viable option – in his mind - until he finds a reason to pick himself up.

 

He finds one. 

 

Mike discovers a young woman – barely alive - left on the side of the road, and he, an ex-cop, vows to find the perpetrator. 

 

“Small Town Crime” is a story of redemption, and it uncovers secrets, marches into violence and steps into noir, even under blue skies.   As a noir picture, it visually hits the mark of a modern-day - but still desolate - west.  A place that stocks a little more civility and populace than the locations in “U Turn” (1997), “Breakdown” (1997) and “Blood Simple” (1984), but carries that same uneasy feeling: gunplay or criminal freewill could erupt at any time.

 

Obviously, an engaging story and interesting characters are vital for a movie’s success, but for a low budget indie, these cinematic ingredients become infinitely more important.  Unfortunately, the featured mystery loses steam and falls into conventional criminal spaces last seen in television shows like “Starsky and Hutch” and “The A-Team”, but without escorted, cheesy action-adventure soundtracks and with more cursing.   With limited options, there is only so much blood that Hawkes can pull from a stone, as Mike snoops around the local bars and looks for connections that dangle both outside and within his reach.

 

Hawkes, 58, performs more than admirably and fills the screen with his portrayal of a crafty underachieving sad sack, hampered by the constant lure of alcohol, and physically, he perfectly fits the part.  Mike is an aging 45.  With a slim build and deep lines etched across his face, one can almost visualize every argument, bar fight, drunken stupor, and failed dream throughout his life with just a few seconds glance at the man.  Other than Hawkes, however, the only other intriguing characters are a local pimp, Mood (Clifton Collins Jr.), and a bearded mercenary with mod glasses curiously named Orthopedic (Jeremy Ratchford).  The rest of the main players - Octavia Spencer, Anthony Anderson and Robert Forster - are just not given enough to do.  

 

Actually, one other character is given a lot to do, and that is Mike’s muscle car.  Although Mike shows little regard for himself (at least at the beginning of the picture), he shows great pride in his shiny, black muscle car.  The Nelms brothers show off every angle and several Herculean roars of this impressive automobile, and might one swear that they are channeling their inner “Two-Lane Blacktop” (1971).  That’s not necessarily a bad thing, but when a man and his car become – by far - the two most absorbing entities in a noir mystery, a problem certainly exists. 

 

“Small Town Crime” does reveal some fun novelties, including an effective shootout, some visual eccentricities and odd, sudden shifts in tones from comedy to crime, however at the end of the day, the film adds up to a curiosity.   Like stopping at a diner on a lonely road while traveling cross-country.  A monster omelet and bottomless cups of warm coffee are memorable and the hospitality felt nice, but not enough to unpack the car and set up permanent camp. 

(2/4 stars)

 

Jeff – a member of the Phoenix Critics Circle – has penned film reviews since 2008 and graduated from ASU’s Walter Cronkite School of Journalism.  Follow Jeff and the Phoenix Film Festival on Twitter @MitchFilmCritic and @PhoenixFilmFest, respectively.

 

Forever My Girl - Movie Review by Jeff Mitchell

Forever My Girl.jpg

‘Forever My Girl’ does not last

 

Written and directed by:  Bethany Ashton Wolf

Starring:  Alex Roe, Jessica Rothe and Abby Ryder Fortson

 

“Forever My Girl” – Eight years.  A lot can happen in eight years. 

 

A fourth grader will become a high school senior.

A U.S. president can spend two terms in office.

The French could build four more Eiffel Towers.

Americans built a manned rocket that landed on the moon, and actually, it only took seven years from JFK’s famous “Moon Speech” to Apollo 11.

 

The point is a lot can happen in eight years.   For Liam Page (Alex Roe), he left the love of his life, Josie (Jessica Rothe), at the altar, but not a lot happened between them for eight years.  In fact, nothing did. 

 

While Liam shot into superstardom as a country music star, making records and selling out arenas all over the world, Josie remained in St. Augustine, La. (nicknamed Saint).  She was heartbroken, but not deterred from moving on with her life.   The two, however, did not speak to one another since that infamous day, four Eiffel Towers ago.

 

Eight years later, due to an awfully unfortunate event, Liam found himself back in Saint, and he awkwardly attempts to reconnect with Josie, with a hopeful possibility that they could fall in love again.

 

Based on the 2012 young adult novel by Heidi McLaughlin, writer/director Bethany Ashton Wolf’s picture paints a modern-day fairy tale in Cajun Country, but this story is very difficult to believe.

 

The film’s primary problem is that life’s rough edges are continually smoothed over or ignored in this bizarre alternative universe, an on-screen place where consequences for specific characters’ actions are never addressed in rational ways.

 

To start, in St. Augustine, the townspeople apparently circled the wagons and helped Josie cope with her grief and a specific subsequent consequence (that shall not be named in this review).  In effect, the entire town picked sides and chose Josie, while Liam circled the globe and performed his music.  He did not speak to her, but he also did not contact anyone in his hometown, including his father for eight long years.  (Also, for the record, Liam’s dad, Brian (John Benjamin Hickey), is a local pastor, but even he lost faith in talking with his son.)

 

One would think in the world of social media, at least one Saint person – including a family member – would connect with Liam at least once, even by a fat-fingered smartphone accident.  Alas, perhaps passive aggressiveness runs strong Saint.  Also, Liam did not reach out over Facebook or Instagram either, even though he was hurting every single day – per his words – after inexplicably skipping town on his wedding day.

 

Liam looked for comfort, and he unfortunately soothed via substance abuse for several years, but upon his return to Louisiana, no hint of these problems appear to exist.  Surely, moviegoers are not rooting for Liam to turn to drugs or alcohol while recourting Josie, but not addressing the issue feels all too convenient.   

 

Curiously, the script doubles down in this space. 

 

While home, Liam feels that Josie’s family plays life too safely, so he preaches, “Sometimes you got to let go, walk on the wild side and everything will be okay.”  

 

With a history of substance abuse, walking “on the wild side” is probably not the best advice to offer, but Josie and her family gladly accept these words of wisdom without batting an eye.  More key plot fulcrums raise some head scratching moments, such as Liam finding some magical off-screen time to write a brand new album that his manager keeps badgering him to do.  Liam apparently wrote a collection of brand new inspirational tunes in a blink of an eye. 

 

With key bats and blinks, “Forever My Girl” – again - steps into an alternative, illogical universe.

 

Admittedly, this universe is a pleasant and light one, so it is best not to take the events of the PG-rated, 1-hour 44-minute story too seriously, however, are these the healthiest life lessons for younger audiences?  

 

Rothe does portray Josie as a strong woman, but is semi-emotionally holding onto Liam for almost a decade the best choice, and why exactly didn’t Liam ask for help over eight years or anyone on his management team notice?

 

These types of questions are never explored, and Roe and Rothe do not really receive very many chances to click into deeper themes or tap into on-screen chemistry.  As a consolation, at least Liam finds time to open his dad’s eyes to better coffee in the morning.  Hey, coffee is important! 

 

An important point to note: Roe never sang in public before taking this role, and the actor does a very convincing job of portraying a country superstar.  Roe makes it look seamless, and audiences will be impressed with his bravery and stage presence.  

 

Well, what can Liam and Josie do for an encore in “Forever My Girl 2”?  Not exactly sure.   Perhaps, they can make better use of eight years and construct a manned rocket to Mars.

(1/4 stars)

 

 

Jeff – a member of the Phoenix Critics Circle – has penned film reviews since 2008 and graduated from ASU’s Walter Cronkite School of Journalism.  Follow Jeff and the Phoenix Film Festival on Twitter @MitchFilmCritic and @PhoenixFilmFest, respectively.

 

 

 

 

 

Happy End - Movie Review by Jeff Mitchell

Haneke’s ‘Happy End’ illustrates that money can’t buy happiness

 

Written and directed by:  Michael Haneke

Starring:  Isabelle Huppert, Jean-Louis Trintignant, Mathieu Kassovitz, Fantine Harduin, and Toby Jones

 

“Happy End” – Money can’t buy happiness.

 

After watching writer/director Michael Haneke’s new movie, one could easily picture the aforementioned, famous saying as the film’s title, because the wealthy family featured – the Laurents - lumber in a constant state of dysfunction.   Most Haneke fans – who appreciate this filmmaker’s frequent and wholehearted dives into cynical, offputting material - will embrace “Happy End” and leave the theatre satisfied, but not necessarily happy.

 

With Haneke, that’s generally the point.

 

Rather than driving home his points through a specific, sweeping story arc, Haneke captures a Laurent-slice of life over the course of 1 hour 47 minutes and repeatedly and successfully leaves the audience numb, horrified or occasionally caught in nervous laughter because of pure disbelief.

 

Filmed in the beautiful coastal location of Calais – the very northern point of France and a scant few miles from Great Britain across the English Channel – the Laurents should be enjoying a luxurious life as the principal owners of a construction company/real estate firm that, theoretically, should run itself.   Although a snag of epic proportions suddenly arises on their latest building site, and actually, the problem is the polar opposite of the word: rise.  The matriarch, Anne (Isabelle Huppert) – the most grounded in the family - attempts to smooth out this rocky occurrence. 

 

As the story unfolds – however - this physically enormous business-setback pales in comparison to the troubles within the clan, their associated, individual character flaws and poor judgment.  Anne, Anne’s father George (Jean-Louis Trintignant), her son Pierre (Franz Rogowski), her brother Thomas (Mathieu Kassovitz), his daughter Eve (Fantine Harduin), and his wife Anais (Laura Verlinden) spend a vast majority of time existing in broken and isolated relationships, and also within the Laurent home, a local hospital and a few other indoor locales.  The camera does occasionally nuzzle with the gorgeous Calais scenery, including a warm, sunny beach sequence - but many times the audience is placed inside, accompanied by cold, unhealthy on-screen behavior, with an occasional open window revealing blue skies and green trees, but those comforting locks of nature seem far, far away. 

 

Anne is a steady source of comfort and manages the toxic behavior when it becomes visible to her, as evidenced by her concern for Pierre, who lacks focus and direction, except when trying to sabotage the family during public gatherings.  Anne worries about his destructive tendencies, but, unfortunately, she does not know how to emotionally reach him.   Pierre isolates, like the individual Laurents frequently do.  Much of the family’s detrimental behavior goes unnoticed by Anne, but not by the audience via Haneke’s reveals, sometimes voyeuristically and other times in plain sight.

 

Like the windows revealing soothing weather so far away, Haneke masterfully frames his subjects or settings by simply placing his camera in one spot for lengthy periods, while letting the eventual movement or narration dictate anxiety.  This effective practice harkens back to memories of “Cache” (2005), but Haneke is not – by design - as singularly-focused here as in that film. 

 

Actually, he does uncover a truly startling connection to one of his previous movies in a moment of conversational enlightenment that does help rationalize one character’s specific behavior.  Appropriate rationales are certainly not the norm, including another Laurent’s monstrous tendencies, and of course, the film links them with an audience’s fears during the picture’s most vulnerable moments.

 

Money may not buy happiness, but – as “Happy End” illustrates - mass quantities of wealth do not address humanity’s vulnerabilities either.  With satire, sorrow and secrecy bathing in dark corners and also in broad daylight, don’t worry, be happy never felt so difficult.

(3/4 stars)

 

Jeff – a member of the Phoenix Critics Circle – has penned film reviews since 2008 and graduated from ASU’s Walter Cronkite School of Journalism.  Follow Jeff and the Phoenix Film Festival on Twitter @MitchFilmCritic and @PhoenixFilmFest, respectively.

12 Strong - Movie Review by Ben Cahlamer

12 Strong Poster.jpg

12 Strong

 

Directed by Nicolai Fuglsig

Written by Ted Tally and Peter Craig, based on Horse Soldiers by Doug Stanton

Starring Chris Hemsworth, Michael Shannon, Michael Pena, Navid Neghban, Trevante Rhodes, Geoff Stults, Thad Luckinbill

 

The greatest thing that any human can do for another is to sacrifice themselves. Each situation determines the level of sacrifice, however, no greater level of sacrifice occurs than when our servicemen are called to duty. Following the events on September 11th, 2001, the military swiftly and deftly moved in to Afghanistan.

Based on the novel Horse Soldiers by Doug Stanton, Nicolai Fuglsig’s 12 Strong focuses on the elite group of 12 Green Beret members of Operational Detachment Alpha (ODA) 595. While Task Force Dagger was the lead company responsible for those early operations, ODA-595 was on the ground, pushing through the Taliban’s strongholds using unconventional warfare.

Chris Hemsworth plays Captain Mitch Nelson, the leader of ODA-595. Mr. Hemsworth’s approach to the character was to infuse it with his trademark humor. He also approached the character as a deeply committed man to his family, something we get early on, to his country and to his men and the mission, most importantly. He earns our trust in the early stages of the film as well, especially as Chief Warrant Officer Spencer, played by Michael Shannon, comes to his aid. Michael Pena plays Sergeant Sam Diller who offers his own brand of humor while the acclaimed Trevante Rhodes (Moonlight) plays Sergeant Ben Milo. Both performers enhance the team on the screen, especially during the action sequences and both add to the unconventional nature of the film.

What makes Mr. Fuglsig’s directorial debut so interesting is its unconventional nature. The script by Ted Tally and Peter Craig builds trust quite quickly in our hero with his swift call to action. This is necessary because part of ODA 595’s mission was diplomacy. Captain Nelson not only needed to fight a war in unconventional means, but he also needed to build the trust of General Abdul Rashid Dostum (Navid Negahban) while getting in-country support and the lay of the land. The film only touches on this aspect in passing, but does it with the flair of a Jerry Bruckheimer production.

Bruckheimer staple William Fichtner makes an appearance as Colonel Mulholland, the leader of Task Force Dagger. His dry sense of timing and humor enlightens us as to the precarious nature of this mission and the dangers awaiting ODA-595. One of the best sequences in the film is played between Mr. Fichtner and Mr. Hemsworth and is a highlight of the film. Comedian Rob Riggle is yet another unconventional choice if you follow his stand-up and television career, but did you know that he was a Marine? In fact, the name of his character is the name of the man who he reported to as a Marine. It was a delight to see him share screen time with both Mr. Hemsworth and Mr. Fichtner.

Mr. Tally and Mr. Craig’s script uses all of these elements build us up to a moment of pride, as we see ODA-595 on horseback, riding through the mountains in yet another unconventional aspect of this mission: the mountains that make up the geography of Afghanistan are some of the most treacherous in the world that they cannot be walked with great ease, which makes for an ideal place for the Taliban regimes to hold out. Never underestimate the determinism and resolve of the United States military though. This is the hallmark of the producing team that brought us Only the Brave last fall.

The combination of the two production styles truly shines in Mr. Fuglsig’s hands. Mr. Fuglsig is a journalist by trade and much like the subjects of this film, Mr. Fuglsig’s past experiences prepared him for this moment. His eye for photography shines in this film through Rasmus Videbaek’s (The Dark Tower) eyes.

The amount of pride generated from this film sets aside many of the challenges the story has. It is as if the energy and the bravado from The Rock met the bravery and the heroism of Only the Brave with just a sprinkle of Lawrence of Arabia for good measure.

3 out 4 stars.

Den of Thieves - Movie Review by Ben Cahlamer

Den of Thieves.jpg

Den of Thieves

 

Directed by Christian Gudegast

Written by Christian Gudegast and Paul Scheuring

Starring Gerard Butler, Curtis “50 Cent” Jackson, Pablo Schreiber, O’Shea Jackson Jr, Evan Jones, Dawn Olivieri, Mo McRae, Max Holloway

 

Bank heists have served as the foundation of some of the most ingenious films. Kathryn Bigelow’s “Point Break” immediately comes to mind as does Michael Mann’s “Heat.” Each of these films uses a bank heist as its central thesis to build the main characters; both films have rogues on either side of the law who are hell-bent on achieving their end goals, with no regard for others. Since the trope seems to be on the verge of “rinse, wash, repeat,” someone must’ve thought it was a good time to try and update the formula with a few new tricks. Here enters first-time director Christian Gudegast’s “Den of Thieves” featuring Gerard Butler.

Mr. Butler plays Nick O’Brien, the leader of the L.A. County Sheriff’s Major Crimes unit who, with his elite team, investigates the theft of an armored truck. Their investigation leads them to an elite crew looking to take down a major score. O’Shea Jackson, Jr, Curtis “50 Cent” Jackson and Pablo Schreiber co-star.

Character motives are key to a bank heist story. On the surface, Mr. Gudegast and Paul Scheruing’s (TV’s ‘Prison Break,’ “A Man Apart,” “The Experiment”) script misses this mark. We get murky characters who move throughout the film, whose function is to essentially stop one another. Yes, they are calculating, but they are doing it without any thought. Now, one would think that this is the prime reason for being a rogue. And, yet, there was no motive.

Mr. Gudegast understands his frame, and so the look of the film flows with an acceptable pace. However, his use of flashbacks distracts us, and apparently himself, from the key objective. Secondary to this, is the rehashed trope of a “detective on the edge”. In contrast to Al Pacino’s Vincent Hannah from “Heat,” Mr. Butler’s Nick O’Brien takes his self-abuse further. It’s an interesting experiment on the character. In the hands of another actor, it might have worked better, but I think both Mr. Butler and Mr. Gudegast put the character so far into ‘overdrive’ that the side story became irrelevant because it didn’t change his motive.

The rogues on the wrong side of the law have even fewer personal motivations, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t cool to watch on the screen. The trouble is that none of them are relatable, although as the investigation uncovers their histories, questions arise, which ultimately remain unanswered. I don’t necessarily think these details were meant to be addressed, but they felt like these details subverted the true potential of the film.

There’s a scene in the middle of the movie that pays homage to several other bank heist films and its linkage with the third act is probably the most ingenious part of this narrative. This is because the cast and crew are firing on all of their cylinders. It, unfortunately, leads into a protracted third act and the payoff.

The characters and the story deliver the payoff. But, it is not well-earned and that’s this film’s biggest flaw. A lack of motivation doesn’t yield the results you seek, even if you busted your ass to get there.

It’s funny the way Hollywood works out its release schedule. For two weeks in a row, two of the creatives behind “London Has Fallen” have had their respective releases: Babk Najafi’s “Proud Mary” and now Mr. Gudegast’s debut film here. I’d like to see more of what Mr. Gudegast has in his gas tank because I think he can go the distance. “Den of Thieves” has glimmers of his brilliance, but it isn’t there just yet.

2 out of 4 stars