Anna Karenina Movie Review

Anna Karenina   

Starring:  Keira Knightley, Jude Law, Aaron Taylor-Johnson

 

Directed by Joe Wright

 

Rated: R

Run Time: 130 mins

Genre: Drama

 

Opens Novemeber 21st

 

By Lisa Minzey of The Reel Critic.com

 

 

Hey Phoenix Film Fans, another release this week is the modern retelling of the story by 19th Century novelist Leo Tolystoy, Anna Karenina. In this version of the film, stage and screen scribe Tom Stoppard and Director Joe Wright put their artistic touch on a classic story. On the 2012 film festival circuit, Anna Karenina picked up a few awards for Production Design at the Hollywood Film Festival and Breakthrough Performer Awards for Domhall Gleeson and Alicia Vikander at the Hamptons International Film Festival.

 

Set in 1874 Empirical Russia, Anna Karenina (Keira Knightley) and her husband Count Alexi Alexandrovna Karenin (Jude Law) are a part of Russian high society, very well respected and well-known in St. Petersburg. When Anna receives a letter from her brother asking her to visit to help straighten out a situation that his wife is about to leave him for, she travels to Moscow to act as a mediator to rectify the issue.  When she arrives, she is introduced to Count Vronsky (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) and the attraction is instant and intense. Anna tries to stay away from Vronsky, but he follows her back to St. Petersburg, where a torrid affair ensues. Anna, unable to deny her feelings for Vronsky, is ordered by Alexi to stay away from the Count and behave like the respectable married woman she is (supposed) to be.

As karma would have it, Anna ends up pregnant and now must choose between her life with Alexi, filled with honor, respect, dignity and wealth or leave her husband for Count Vronsky and have the reputation of shame, disgrace follow her for the rest of her life, along with loosing her son whom she has with Alexi.

 

In this retelling of Anna Karenina, a few thoughts sprung to the forefront of my mind while watching this film. The art direction, although quite lovely, was disconnected to the film and the artistic element of shifting scenes as a stage production was confusing and unnecessary to convey the essence of the story. The transformation from stage to scene was a dizzying arrangement, leading to further disconnect from the characters and the story. On a positive note, the costume design was spectacular; from the jewelry  to the gowns to the military uniforms and men’s formal attire, the wardrobe selections are a visual feast for the eyes. The acting was decent, but it would have been preferable to have some Russian accents with some of the characters instead of all British accents; it slightly took away from the period and setting of the story. Just saying.  It seemed to this reviewer that this film was trying to capture the intensity of the novel but setting to a pace/ artistic style more like "Moulin Rouge". You be the judge when Anna Karenina opens in theaters starting Wednesday November 21, 2012

 

A Royal Affair Review

A Royal Affair   

Starring:  Alicia Vikander, Mads Mikkelsen, Mikkel Boe Følsgaard

 

Directed by Nikolaj Arcel

 

Rated: R

Run Time: 137 mins

Genre: Drama/ Romance/ History

 

Opens November 16th

 

By Lisa Minzey of The Reel Critic.com

 

 

Hey Phoenix Film Friends, if you’re a fan of world cinema then we have a treat for you! This film was nominated for a few Silver Berlin Bear Awards at the 2012 Berlin International Film Festival and won in two categories – Best Actor & Best Screenplay.

 

In the 1700’s there was a movement that was sweeping across Europe and eventually found its way to the American shores where as our country was founded on: The Enlightenment. In Denmark, there rules a young king, King Christian VII (Mikkel Boe Følsgaard) whose peculiar ways made those who surround him and had an agenda made it easy for their plots to be approved unnoticed.  Until Christian’s bride arrives, Catherine Mathilde (Alicia Vikander) from England does things start to lean towards change. The marriage between Christian and Catherine was prearranged, so when she arrived in Denmark, his behavior was unbeknownst to the poor girl. She is now stuck in a foreign county, betrothed to a lunatic, who prefers the company of whores as his bride is not “fun enough”. After their first child is born, Christian embarks on a grand royal tour of Europe, where he expected to be away for almost two years. Catherine refused to accompany him, so he takes off on his own. Along the way, the royal cabinet decides he needs a personal physician to oversee Christian’s irrational behavior. In Germany, two ex-pats of Denmark who had been thrown out of the royal court, learn of a Dr. Johann Friedrich Strunsee (Mads Mikkelsen) who had been working in the sick wards of he Schleswig-Holstein area. Dr. Strunsee was chosen by Christian as he was able to communicate with him and get him to submit to a more rational way of behaving.

 

When the tour ended, Dr. Strunsee was kept on and brought back toDenmarkto live at the palace. Catherine was on guard with the doctor as he had too much power when it came to Christian. The marital issues between Catherine and Christian did not improve by his absence, driving him more into the insane world that he has built to protect himself. Dr. Strunsee tried to help at the insistence of Christian to make him wife more “fun”, but the closer that Strunsee grew to Catherine a royal affair blossomed.

 

Catherine and Dr. Strunsee knew if they could bend Christian’s ear, putting some of the Enlightenment movement ideas into his head, they could reform the laws that would help the people of Denmark live better lives.  Christian at first was nervous, but Strunsee told him to imagine himself as an actor playing a part as a powerful king; how would Christian perform the role? That bit of advice help the people of Denmark by cleaning up the streets, starting an orphanage and many other public works that the people were grateful for but enraged the establishment. Will the affair become public knowledge, destroying everything that Christian, Catherine and Strunsee worked so hard for or will the establishment rise to regain their power once more?

 

It was fascinating to see how the ideas and founding principals took shape in other countries during the same time ofAmerica’s establishment.  “A Royal Affair” is an exquisite film that is heartbreaking, inspiring and gripping that will stay with you long after the film has ended. If you are a fan of world cinema this film is surely one you will not want to miss as it has all the elements of a dynamic film experience. From the sets, the costumes, the acting and the story, everything was put together brilliantly. Be sure to catch this film when it opens at Harkins Camelview Friday November 16, 2012.

 

Lincoln Review

Lincoln   

Starring: Daniel Day-Lewis, Tommy Lee Jones, Sally Field, Joseph Gordon Levitt, David Strathairn, James Spader, Lee Pace

 

 

 

Directed by Steven Spielberg

 

Rated: PG-13

Run Time: 149 mins

Genre: Drama/ Biography/ History

 

Opens November 16th

 

By Lisa Minzey of The Reel Critic.com

 

 

Can you feel it in the air?  Aside from the crisp cool weather, Oscar watch is officially underway and does this film pack a wallop! Director Steven Spielberg (per usual) artfully and brilliantly assembled a cast worthy of bringing such a notable historic figure to life.

 

The year was 1865. The Civil War was deep into its fourth year, and Abraham Lincoln (Daniel Day-Lewis) was starting his second term as president. He and his cabinet were earnestly searching for a resolution to bring the war to an end, butLincolnknew that he had to bring the 13th amendment to pass before it would end.  If not, every man that died would have died in vain andLincolnwas not about to let that happen. Over the course of 3 months, President Lincoln had to convince his cabinet, his constituents, his family and get Congress to pass the 13th Amendment before he could let the peace talks begin. The film chronicles the high and low points of the historic amendment, ending slavery and beginning the talks of bringing the Civil War to a close.

 

What is so fascinating to watch in this film is how every actor brought to life the prominent figures they were cast in and how poignant, artful and humanistic each role was. Daniel Day-Lewis’s transformation on screen as Lincoln makes the viewer forget that this was the same man that was the Butcher in Gangs of New York. He is so utterly perfect in this role that it is hard to imagine any other actor cast as Lincoln.  The supporting cast was equally brilliant from Tommy Lee Jones as Sen. Thaddeus Stevens, Sally Field as Mary Todd Lincoln and even James Spader as lobbyist W.N. Bilbo. Each actor was excellent in their respective roles and was more pleasantly surprising to see when entered on screen. Take for instance Lee Pace as Democratic Senator Fernando Wood. Pace has been in a handful of film roles but most notable for his TV role on Pushing Daisies. Another example would be Jared Harris as Gen. Ulysses S. Grant, who has been in several films such as the latest Sherlock Holmes as Moriarty, and more recently in TV as the evil genius David Robert Jones on Fringe.

 

The cinematography was equally stunning by the use of light. The way that the light paints the scene adds to the mood, making appear as a painting or a picture from a Lincoln when it opens in theaters on Friday November 16, 2012.

 

The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2 Review

The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2   

Starring:

Starring: Robert Pattinson, Kristen Stewart, Taylor Lautner, Ashley Greene, Dakota Fanning, Jackson Rathborne, Nikki Reed, Kellan Lutz, Bryce Dallas Howard, Billy Burke, Peter Facinelli, Elizabeth Reaser, Xavier Samuel

 

Directed by Bill Condon

 

Rated:  PG-13

Run Time: 115 mins

Genre: Action/ Adventure/ Romance/ Thriller

 

 

Opens November 16th

 

By Lisa Minzey of The Reel Critic.com

 

 

In the 5th installment and final of the Twilight Series, Bella (Kristen Stewart) and Edward (Robert Pattinson) are now parents of a baby girl and Bella is a full blown vampire. Now their world is perfect, except for Jacob (Taylor Lautner) imprinting on their daughter Renesmee (Mackenzie Foy) and the vampire clan the Volturi learning that Bella and Edward have a child. The very existence of Renesmee can put the Cullens and the rest of the vampire world at risk, which the Volutri see as a risk they are unwilling to take.

Now Bella, Edward and the rest of the Cullens must assemble as many witnesses as possible  to confirm that Reneseme is not a threat, but a blessing to their existence or fight to the death trying. Will Bella and Edward be able to protect their family or will their love story end in tragedy, just like a Shakespearean play?

***SPOILERS*** FROM THIS POINT ON….

I have to admit that Breaking Dawn is my favorite book out of the series. As for the films, I honestly haven’t been a fan due to the abundance of amateurish acting and Katherine Hardwicke’s poor start of the series. With that said, I genuinely enjoyed Part 1 of the film, but Part 2 was only subpar. They did get a few things right as it did not deviate too far away from the book and they ended it with an additional scene that was not in the book that should appease the male viewers that get dragged to the film. It wasn’t until this film that I noticed how ridiculous the dialogue was from the book, but still found it amusing to hear it performed on film. The first scene of where Bella is hunting in the forest to feed was too campy in my opinion as the running seemed like it was out of a late 1970’s tv show. The fight sequence was choreographed well, but again the special effects were lackluster. The FX artists did manage to get the sparkle on the skin and Bella’s shielding effects right. The most moving part though had to be in the credits where the look of the book and the film met, creating a beautiful wrap up to the last 5 films and ending the trilogy nicely. Breaking Dawn Part 2 opens in theaters nation wide Friday November 16, 2012.

 

Lincoln review from guest critic, Colin Boyd

Lincoln   

Starring: Daniel Day-Lewis, Tommy Lee Jones, Sally Field, Joseph Gordon Levitt, David Strathairn, James Spader, Lee Pace

 

 

 

Directed by Steven Spielberg

 

Rated: PG-13

Run Time: 149 mins

Genre: Drama/ Biography/ History

 

Opens November 16th

 

Reviewed by guest critic, Colin Boyd

 

 

It says a lot about the performance of Daniel Day-Lewis that Lincoln, an otherwise perfectly fine but unimpressive film, could be about 40% worse and still be worth seeing. It arrives at the time of the year when performances are supposed to stand out, and Day-Lewis will likely stand out the most.

 

There's a short list of actors who are generally considered among the best in the world and the two-time Oscar winner (My Left Foot and There Will Be Blood) can be found at or near the top of it. If you're an actor with a conscience, bringing to life any historical figure to life on screen has inherent responsibilities. In American history, nobody else quite rises to the level of Lincoln. That raises the stakes, and Day-Lewis, by virtue of his pristine track record, raises the expectations. Amazingly enough, he manages to quietly surpass them.

 

Steven Spielberg's film is taken from the pages of Doris Kearns Goodwin's book, Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln, and it has had a long gestation. Spielberg heard about the proposed book from the author in 1999 and committed to adapting it on the spot. Liam Neeson was confirmed to play Lincoln for the better part of decade while Spielberg worked on other projects and replacement screenwriter Tony Kushner adapted a dense story into a script (at one point, the screenplay reached 500 pages). Finally in 2010, Day-Lewis signed on and production slowly began.

 

Appropriate for the current political climate, Lincoln is long on gridlock and grind. The film begins in what we would now call the lame duck session, after his 1864 reelection, with Lincoln hatching a plan to outlaw slavery once and for all. His Emancipation Proclamation was an executive order freeing current slaves in seceded states, but the Thirteenth Amendment would be the final word. And Lincoln used the North's momentum in the bloody Civil War as a tool to leverage the legislation.

 

It may have been the biggest political risk in U.S. history -- keep up the fighting until the amendment would pass instead of negotiating an earlier peace -- and it certainly had very little support beyond Lincoln's closest allies. As a film device, this may rub audiences the wrong way, dealing as it does with negotiations and tactics more than the life and even most of the personal struggles of our tragic 16th president. What Spielberg has done here is not present a timeline or even a biography. This is instead evidence of Abraham Lincoln's character through a particularly trying time, even by the standards of his particularly trying presidency.

 

Much of the screenplay seems like recitations of speeches or diary entries, and while that gives Lincoln some historical credibility, it also leads to some very long monologues. Some are fantastic and others are just long. The film's primary drawback is its pacing and tone, and those speeches are a big reason why. However, Lincoln also goes for laughs at strange times (just look for James Spader) and occasionally offsets the president's somber nature with boisterous scenes that don't play well.

 

There are too many characters. Joseph Gordon-Levitt, playing Lincoln's eldest son, is adrift. Congressmen come and go with blinding frequency. And while those things may have been important at the time, they are not as important to the film and only take away from what is important, namely that central performance.

 

Tommy Lee Jones (as Rep. Thaddeus Stevens) and Sally Field (as long-suffering Mary Todd Lincoln) will get a modicum of Oscar talk, but the only real achievement is by Daniel Day-Lewis. It not only captures what we know about Lincoln but also illustrates those things we don't. It goes beyond technical proficiency into immersion, and does so without ever sliding into mimicry. This is one of the extremely rare portrayals that redefines a character from our shared history, like DeNiro's Jake LaMotta. Lincoln will never look or sound exactly the same again thanks to Daniel Day-Lewis.

Harkins prepping audiences for Hitchcock by screening classics

Fans to enjoy warm up for exclusive engagement of Hitchcock at Harkins Camelview 5 Theatres  

For one week only, Harkins Theatres presents some of Alfred Hitchcock’s most celebrated films exclusively at Harkins Valley Art Theatre. Beginning Friday, November 16, Hitchcock fans can relive the intensity of Rear Window, Vertigo and Psycho on the big screen.

 

All three films will show each day throughout the run, in anticipation of the new feature film, Hitchcock, opening Friday, November 23 exclusively at Harkins Camelview 5 Theatres. Hitchcock is the true-story behind the difficult production of Psycho, and delves into Hitchcock's fascination with the real-life serial killer who served as the inspiration for Norman Bates. The film stars Anthony Hopkins as Alfred Hitchcock and Helen Mirren as his wife, Alma and Scarlett Johansson as Janet Leigh and is rated PG-13.

 

Visit www.harkinstheatres.com for tickets and showtimes. Standard ticket prices apply.

 

A Royal Affair is getting noticed

A Royal Affair is opening this Friday (11/16) at Harkins Camelview and is getting rave reviews. It's a film that was made in Denmark but is getting some great acclaim in the United States. Fresh off it's World Audience Award at AFI Fest, it was named the Phoenix Film Critics Society movie of the week this week. Then there's the national reviews that have been pretty great. Here are some of the quotes from reviews: “SUPERBLY ENTERTAINING AND SUMPTUOUSLY PRODUCED. Mads Mikkelsen gives a marvelous performance.” – Joe Morgenstern, Wall Street Journal

“A SLAM DUNK IN THE GENRE, SATISFYING EVERY PERIOD PIECE CRAVING. A Royal Affair enthralls where many historical dramas start to sag. NOTHING BEATS A WELL TOLD TALE OF A SCANDALS PAST THAT YOU’VE NEVER HEARD BEFORE.” – Mary Pols, Time

“FIRST RATE. EVER SO MUCH MORE THAN A HISTORICAL ROMANCE.” – Roger Ebert, Chicago SunTimes

“MAGNIFICENT! A ravishing, stunning epic with superlative performances. A riveting, compelling love story from a brilliant filmmaker. A must see for fans of great world cinema.” -Pete Hammond, Boxoffice Magazine

“SUMPTUOUS AND ENTHRALLING WITH RIVETING PERFORMANCES. A gripping chapter of history recounted with elegance and intelligence. Admires of classy costume drama will eat up this well-crafted film.” - David Rooney, Hollywood Reporter

 

You may want to give it a look this weekend.  Here's some more information about the film.....

Director: Nikolaj Arcel

Screenplay: Rasmus Heisterberg & Nikolaj Arcel

Starring: Mads Mikkelsen, Trine Dyrholm, Alicia Vikander, William Jøhnk Nielsen, David Dencik, Rosalinde Mynster, Cyron Bjørn Melville, Søren Malling, Thomas W. Gabrielsson, Laura Bro

Synopsis: A ROYAL AFFAIR is the true story of an ordinary man who wins the queen's heart and starts a revolution. Centering on the intriguing love triangle between the ever more insane Danish King Christian VII (Mikkel Boe Følsgaard), the royal physician who is a man of enlightenment and idealism Struensee (Mads Mikkelsen) and the young but strong Queen Caroline Mathilda (Alicia Vikander), A ROYAL AFFAIR is the gripping tale of brave idealists who risk everything in their pursuit of freedom for their people… Above all it is the story of a passionate and forbidden romance that changed an entire nation.

Move Review for A Late Quartet

A Late Quartet    

Starring: Phillip Seymour Hoffman, Christopher Walken, Catherine Keener, Mark Ivanie, Imogen Poots

 

Directed by Yaron Zilberman

 

Rated: R

Run Time: 105 mins

Genre: Drama

 

Opens November 9th

 

By Lisa Minzey of The Reel Critic.com

 

 

For the past 25 seasons, the Fugue Quartet have traveled the world together, performing in world famous venues, for thousands of people. The quartet was formed in the late 1980’s by students and a faculty member of Carnegie Hall.  Daniel Lerner (Mark Ivanir) holds the position of 1st violin; Robert Gelbart (Phillip Seymour Hoffman) currently holds the 2nd violin chair; Juliette Gelbart plays the viola and Peter Mitchell (Christopher Walken) rounds up the group by playing the cello.

 

In the past year, the dynamic of the group was rocked to its core when Peter had to step aside to mourn the loss of his wife, Miriam (Anne Sofie von Otter). Upon his return, he notices that he is not able to play as well. He seeks out medical help and is diagnosed with the early stages of Parkinson’s disease. Peter decides that this season if he is well enough to play with the aid of medication, will be his last. The rest of the group is shocked, but in various stages of denial or planning their next moves. Juliette is adamant that Peter will play as they have chosen Beethoven Opus 131 C-sharp minor quartet as their opening selection. Daniel is trying to figure out who can replace Peter and if he can get the same cellist that replaced him in his absence after Miriam’s death, Nina Lee. Robert, on the other hand, is looking at this as an opportunity to shake things up by alternating with Daniel the roles of playing 1st violin. Robert is tired of playing second to Daniel and wants to grow as a performer.

 

Juliette and Daniel vehemently disagree with Robert, meeting secretly to discuss how to change his mind, continuing to play 2nd violin. Robert is one of the best at that position, and to change his position so late into their group’s history is unsettling. Juliette and Robert discuss the change up one night on the way home from a gathering at Peter’s home, which results in Robert storming of angrily, not returning home for the evening. Their marriage has also been hanging by a delicate thread, mostly due to the lack of emotional support by Juliette. The news about Peter has caused Juliette to push Robert further away, and now with the lack of support about his future aspirations, Robert makes a heinous decision that could end his marriage and the group altogether.

 

In Daniel’s world, he is also facing a set of personal challenges that could possible destroy the group. He has been coaching Juliette and Robert’s college aged daughter, Alexandra (Imogen Poots) at the suggestion of Peter, as she has immense potential to become a 1st violin player one day. The more time that Alexandra and Daniel spend together, the attraction and temptation becomes too much until she makes the first move. At first, Daniel pushes her away, but quickly succumbs to his feeling and desires.

 

Will the quartet be able to make it to their season opener with Peter or will his health quickly deteriorate? With all of the personal drama between Daniel, Juliette and Robert be able to be set aside for them to continue professionally or will this truly be the last time they all perform, if they make it that far?

 

Mimicking Beethoven Opus 131 C-sharp minor quartet, the story starts off rather slow, builds to a slow crescendo of interpersonal drama between the characters, finishing off in a loud and boisterous way, meaning to be grandiose and poignant. What stood out above the story and acting performances were the musical selections, becoming the unspoken character that kept some bit of sanity among the group. It was refreshing to see Christopher Walken in a more serious role, and for those expecting more cowbell and his usual zany tactics, you may be disappointed or surprised by his subtle performance.  A Late Quartet opens in Phoenix starting Friday November 9, 2012.

 

 

Movie Review for Flight

Flight 

 

Starring: Denzel Washington, John Goodman, Kelly Reilly, Brian Geraghty, Bruce Greenwood, Don Cheadle, Melissa Leo

 

Directed by: Robert Zemeckis

 

Rated: R
Run Time: 138 mins
Genre: Drama

 

Opens November 2nd

 

By Lisa Minzey of The Reel Critic.com

 

Phoenix Film Fans! If you have been looking for a hard-hitting drama, with a cast full of award winning actors, here's a movie for you. This week we checked out the new Robert Zemeckis film "Flight", starring Denzel Washington, John Goodman, Don Cheadle and Melissa Leo.
Veteran airline pilot Whip Whitaker (Denzel Washington) never imagined that a simple flight from Tampa to Atlanta would result in a plane crash.  He and one of the flight attendants from his crew had been partying the night before, and was still slightly inebriated that morning. To help with his hangover, he grabs some orange juice and vodka from the beverage cart for a hair of the dog remedy.

 

His co-pilot, Ken Evans ( Brian Geraghty) may not have as much experience as Whip but he notices the alcohol smell he is emitting.  The flight takes off during a storm, which Whip navigates the plane through with ease.  The rest of the flight should have been a smooth ride, until a few miles outside of Atlanta; the plane's equipment starts to fail and goes into a dive.  Co-pilot Evans freaks out, waking Whip from his nap he was taking. Whip quickly, but calmly, puts the plane into an inverted state, leveling out the dive, gliding them into the crash site.  Fortunately, the plane crashed into an open field where there was bystanders able to help until rescue services arrived.

 

The aftermath of the crash left 6 people dead, two of those being crew members.  An investigation into the site will not only reveal that Whip had been drinking, but had other illegal substances in his system.  While in the hospital, Whip meets a young woman, Nicole ( Kelly Reilly) whose overdose on heroine cost her a trip to the E.R.  Recognizing the pain in Nicole that he feels himself, Whip promises to visit her when he gets out.

 

Even though people are calling him a hero, Whip knows he is in for some serious trouble. Long time friend and union rep, Charlie Anderson (Bruce Greenwood) is standing by Whip, willing to get him the help he needs and through the investigation into the crash.  He even hires hot-shot attorney Hugh Lang ( Don Cheadle) to bury the toxicology reports from the day of the crash.  Will Whip be able to cover up his illness, his lies and alienate those who want to see him get better? Or will Whip continue to spiral out of control until he crashes and burns himself?

 

Denzel Washington in the role of alcoholic pilot Whip Whitaker, although a decent performance, is only made better by the supporting cast. Standout performances by John Goodman and Don Cheadle helped lighten some of the heavier moments of the film, moving the story forward.  This film features drug use, some sexually explicit scenes and showcases the dark nature of alcoholism, not much of a family friendly film.  Check it out when it opens in theaters nationwide Friday November 2, 2012.

Movie Review for The Sessions

 

The Sessions

Starring: John Hawkes, Helen Hunt, William H. Macy, Moon Bloodgood

Directed by: Ben Lewin

Rated: R Run time: 95 mins Genre: Drama

Opens November 2nd

By Lisa Minzey of The Reel Critic.com

Hey Phoenix Film Fans, the week we checked out The Session, a film based on the true story of paraplegic poet/writer, Mark O'Brien. Fun fact about O'Brien, as this is not the first film about him. He was the subject of the 1997 Academy Award winning documentary, "Breathing Lessons: The Life and Work of Mark O'Brien".

Mark O'Brien (John Hawkes) wasn't always paraplegic. At the age of 6, he was struck with polio, leaving him paralyzed from the neck down. His parents were told that he wouldn't make it past childhood, if he were to survive that long. Defying all odds and surpassing everyone's expectations, Mark went on to graduate from University of California, Berkeley in 1978 with a degree in English Mark lived a happy life (for what it was), charming all he would meet. One day, he gets a call from an editor friend who asks him to write an article about sexuality in the handicapped. Mark accepts but thinks it is odd that he was asked considering he's never actually "done the deed", so to say. Yes, that's right, before there was Steve Carrell as the 40 yr old Virgin, there was Mark O'Brien, the 38 year old virgin.

As he conducts his interviews, he realizes, that for him to have a proper article, maybe it's time to pop his cherry. He still has full feeling and functioning blood flow to the nether region, so he is referred to a "sexual surrogate", someone who's not quite a prostitute but helps people get past their barriers of leading a healthy sexually active life.

When Mark meets Cheryl (Helen Hunt) his sexual surrogate, he is extremely nervous. He had discussed his concern with his new priest, Father Brendan (William H. Macy) as he was worried about how this would look to God. Will his soul perish in Hell for eternity because he has sex outside of marriage? Father Brendan gives Mark a "free pass" clearing his conscious on being able to proceed with the article.

Cheryl explains the whole process to Mark, letting him know they only have 6 sessions total to work on his "therapy". Sometimes it takes less than 6 sessions to achieve the goals set, but everyone is different. Will Mark be able to perform and reach his goals of having intercourse and being ale to please a woman? Or will his religious upbringing/ guilt get the best of him, hindering his sex life even further?

Anytime dealing with sexual issues in a visual media such as film, there is a certain amount of sensitivity that need to be addressed, especially when dealing with the handicapped. Director Ben Lewin did a fantastic job, as did John Hawkes, Helen Hunt and William H. Macy in bring the life of Mark O'Brien and this timeframe of his life for portrayal on screen. The film was handled with such humor, grace and love that it shines through the performances and story. Even though it is a sensitive subject, the film is filled with many lighthearted, laugh-out loud moments. Just keep a few tissues handy for those who cry easily in films, this one for some will be a real tearjerker. I would be shocked if this is not nominated for at least some acting awards in the upcoming award season. Be sure o check it out when it opens in Phoenix Friday November 2, 2012.

Wreck-it Ralph Movie Review

Wreck-It Ralph 

 

Starring: (voices of) John C. Reilly, Sarah Silverman, Jane Lynch, Jack McBrayer, Alan Tudyk, Mindy Kaling, Ed O'Neill

 

Directed By: Rich Moore

 

Rated: PG
Run time: 108 mins
Genre: Comedy/Animation/3D/Family

 

Opens November 2nd

 

By Lisa Minzey of The Reel Critic.com

 

If you always wondered as a kid what video game characters did in the arcade after hours, Disney's new animated film Wreck It Ralph answers those burning questions.

 

Thirty years ago, before home gaming consoles were in every home, children and teens would spend a vast majority of their paring playing video games in the arcade.  Back in the day, Fix-it Felix was THE game to play. Styled in the same look as Donkey Kong or early SuperMario Bros, the "villan" of the game was Wreck -It Ralph (John C. Reilly -voice), a freakishly tall, big handed man, weigh in over 600lbs.  He lives in the trash dump next to a high rise condominium that he climbs to wreck.  The people that live in the high rise call out to Fix-it Felix, Jr. (Jack Mc Brayer- voice) to fix the damage that Ralph incurs to their home. Once Felix fixes the building everyone is happy, and he wins a medal and Ralph gets tossed off the building into a puddle of mud. Believe it or not, this would have been a fun game to play back in the 1980's before other games consuls came out like Sega, the various Nintendo systems or XBox.

 

Fast-forward 30 years, and the characters of the game and arcade are celebrating their anniversary, but no one invited Ralph.  Feeling singled out for being his villainous self, he crashes the party (literally) and makes a scene, claiming he can get a medal and be a good guy for once.  No one believes him, to even his support group for villan characters.  Ralph is determined to prove them all wrong, and when an opportunity to win a medal in another game presents itself, he takes it.  Unfortunately, it's in a game that is way out of his league, Hero's Duty. His team leader Calhoun (Jane Lynch - voice) reprimands & belittles him, so Ralph decides to go his separate way to get that medal. Meanwhile, back at the Fix It Felix game, when Ralph doesn't show up as the arcade opens, an out of order sign is placed on the game. In the game world, this is a kiss of death.  If Ralph doesn't come back to the game, the whole game will be out of commission, leaving all the characters homeless.

 

Back in Hero's Duty, Ralph gets his medal, but ends up causing a bigger mess, launching himself and a cybug in a tiny spaceship into another arcade game, Sugar Rush. This game is a total 180 from the previous game, more of a Candy Land meets Mario Cart racing game.  Ralph ends up losing his medal to a little girl,  Vanellope Von Schweetz (Sarah Siverman - voice).  She is the outcast of her game because she has a glitch in her programming, causing her to have spaz fits, making her unfit for racing.  She takes Ralph's medal as an entry for the race and will give it back only if he helps her get the perfect race car to race with. Can these two misfits work together to get what they want or will time run out on Ralph for good? Will Felix be able to find Ralph and bring him back before arcade opens the next day? Can Calhoun get the cybug back to her game before it spreads like a virus, putting all the games out of commission permanently?

 

If you grew up in the arcades, playing the early video games or are a gamer fan in general, this is film a delightful  walk down memory lane. Children of all ages will revel in the story, graphics and enjoy how the characters from games old and new are incorporated through out the movie.  This is a brilliant concept that was fun to watch.  Be sure to catch this in theaters when it opens Friday November 2, 2012.

Denzel Washington and Robert Zemeckis talk about Flight

"Flight" opens Friday, November 2nd Courtesy of Associated Press

NEW YORK (AP) — You might think that Robert Zemeckis, having devoted himself to motion-capture animation for the last 12 years, would be thrilled to return to the unpredictability of live-action filmmaking — those moments of serendipity when the elements align for something surprising.

You would be wrong.

"In my whole career I can count it on one hand," says the director, recalling headaches like having to cart in snow while shooting in Moscow and painting fall foliage in October Vermont. "Every time I've ever been in a situation where, for example, it's 'Oh my God, look at this sky! Look at this sunset!' — it's never there in time. We always missed it. It's just heartbreaking."

"Flight" is Zemeckis' first live-action film since "Cast Away," after which he, more than any other filmmaker, advanced the technology of performance capture with movies like "The Polar Express," ''Beowulf," and "A Christmas Carol."

Instead, "Flight" gets its movie magic principally through its performances, especially that of Denzel Washington, who stars as perhaps the most functional alcoholic in movie history. As Captain Whip Whitaker, Washington plays an airline pilot who, despite being hung-over, drunk and coked-up, manages to bring down a rapidly deteriorating plane in a daring emergency landing on what should have been a routine hop between Orlando, Fla., and Atlanta.

The crash sequence, a virtuoso set piece made with the digital artists from Zemeckis' animated films, features the unusual but effective maneuver of briefly flying the plane upside down. The thrilling crash, which essentially opens the film, is a kind of carrot for moviegoers who are then lured into a powerful character study of Whitaker as he wrestles with his drinking problem while his heroics are called into question. He's a Captain Sully with demons.

"Can anything follow this plane crash?" asks Zemeckis. "But the real spectacle, of course, is Denzel's performance."

It's one that many expect will land Washington his sixth Oscar nomination. (He's won for "Glory" and "Training Day.") His performance is a full portrait of a man who believes he's in control when he isn't, whose alcoholism is propelled by an inability to be honest with himself and others.

"A liar's a liar, however you choose to lie or however you want to numb the pain," says Washington, describing Whitaker. "He made a particular choice to numb the pain."

Washington was drawn to the project by John Gatins' ("Real Steel") script, which Gatins had been working on since 1999. The screenplay surrounds Whitaker with an ensemble of characters who are either challenging him (Kelly Reilly as a recovering heroin addict, Melissa Leo as the crash investigator) or enabling him (Don Cheadle as a cocksure defense attorney, Bruce Greenwood as an old friend and fellow pilot, John Goodman as a drug dealer).

More than most protagonists, Whitaker often verges on unlikable.

"I've heard that from people, but that's what's good about a part in a movie," says Washington. "People say, 'What do you want me to get from it?' I'm like: It depends what you bring to it. So some may not like him."

It was that moral ambiguity that attracted Zemeckis, who constructs a story that poses questions for the audience about sympathy and acknowledging one's own failings.

There have been many films over the years about memorable alcoholics — Ray Milland in "The Lost Weekend," Jack Lemmonin "Days of Wine and Roses" and Nicolas Cage in "Leaving Las Vegas." Asked if he consulted such films in making "Flight," Zemeckis replies, "Only in what not to do."

"If it's just about somebody with chemical dependency, it lets everybody off the hook," says Zemeckis. "It's not relatable. But the fact that everybody — if you really have the courage to be honest with yourself — is flawed, that's a universal theme. That's what I was going for."

That "Flight" soars rather than drowning in the heavy weight of alcoholism is a testament to Zemeckis' sure-handedness in rendering personal stories on a big canvas. (His earlier movies include the "Back to the Future" trilogy, the Oscar-winning "Forrest Gump" and "Contact.") It's an increasingly rare skillfulness, partly because R-rated adult dramas like "Flight" are rarely made in modern Hollywood.

"Flight," which Paramount Pictures will release Nov. 2 with hopes for both solid box office and Academy Awards attention, was made with a production budget of $31 million. That's a relatively small amount for such a film, something that was made possible partially by Zemeckis' digital know-how.

"The only movies worth doing are the ones that are risky," says Zemeckis. "This isn't risky in the budgetary sense, it's risky in whether the audience appreciate the roughness of it."

That "Flight" stars one of the few truly bankable, bona fide movie stars in Washington helps. The movie's poster boasts the handsome visage of the actor in a pilot uniform, surely an attractive fit for a star who has already known the distinctive look of a submarine commander, a train engineer and a Union soldier.

Simply the experience of being in a flight simulator aided Washington in finding his way into Whitaker.

"Just getting into the cockpit, it was like, 'Wow. I'm not going to fly, but I feel like a pilot,'" says Washington.

The actor has little interest in detailing his process, which he self-deprecatingly says "is just acting. Really, it's not that hard." But Washington, a renowned hard worker, concedes: "You do the homework. ... We should all be that way."

Zemeckis calls Washington's performance "breathtaking" and "up there with the greats."

"There's no fooling around," the director says of Washington. "He is very serious and he does massive amounts of work, and I don't quite know the process because it's none of my business. He writes in rehearsal. I'll be saying something, he'll be writing. Another actor will be saying something, he'll be writing."

Zemeckis still believes in motion-capture filmmaking, though the last attempt was a historic flop, Disney's "Mars Needs Moms." Zemeckis produced that film, after which his planned motion-capture remake of the Beatles' "The Yellow Submarine" was canceled. The future of moviemaking, he says, will be a "digital stew" of "moving digital images."

He'll sometimes catch his older films on cable TV and think: "Eh, it's pretty good stuff." Zemeckis would like to see "Flight" with such distance, but, even now, he feels satisfied.

"I like it now," he says with the kind of contentment of one who seldom allows it for himself. "I see the flaws, naturally, but I like it now."

 

Movie Review of Cloud Atlas

Cloud Atlas    

Starring: Tom Hanks,HalleBerry, Hugh Grant, Hugo Weaving, Jim Broadbent, Jim Sturgess, Doona Bae, Ben Whishaw, Keith David, James D’Arcy

 

 

 

Directed by Tom Tykwer, Andy Wachowski and Lana Wachowski

 

Rated: R

Run Time: 172 mins

Genre: Drama/ Fantasty/ Mystery/ Sci-Fi

 

Opens October 26th

 

By Lisa Minzey of The Reel Critic.com

 

Every once in awhile, a film will come along and change the way storytelling is done. The Wachowski brothers became game changers with the film Matrix, blowing away audiences with their extraordinary talent and vision. If there was ever a way to come back on the scene, Andy and Lana Wachowski picked the perfect, ambitious project to do so with Cloud Atlas.

 

Cloud Atlas is an accumulation of 6 storylines ranging from past, present and future over a span of about 600 years.  Each story is observed by the main character featured in the next story, except for the last chapter, which ends in the middle of the film and works back to the beginning to wrap up each storyline. Sounds a little confusing, but it all makes sense in the context of the film  Starting 1849, in the Pacific Islands the story skips to Cambridge, 1936, then to San Francisco, 1973; London 2012; Neo Seoul 2144 and somewhere call the Big Isle, 106 after “The Fall”. Each actor plays a different character in the given time frame, connecting in a new and unique way.

 

Cloud Atlas is a complex story that has many layers and depth that viewers will either love or hate. Upon reflecting on how to explain this to someone who hasn't yet seen the film, this is a film so unique that is has to be seen and experience to understand what it is about. This film has comedy, drama, sci-fi, thriller, mystery and romance so to try and peg it into one category is impossible. The performances from each actor, Tom Hanks, Halle Berry, Jim Sturgess, Hugo Weaving, Hugh Grant, Jim Broadbent and Doona Bae are fantastic in each character they play. Visually, the film is beautiful; everything from the sets, costumes and make-up, each department did an outstanding job of bringing the story of Cloud Atlas to life. The interwoven messages and lessons conveyed on screen are communicated beautifully; evoking deep emotional depths and insightful questions. Viewers will have to pay attention to each story, as the details presented in one vignette will play a pivotal role in another story and may become confusing if not paying attention. This film is philosophical, almost cerebral in nature, thus overall an excellent conversation piece to discuss with others after the film ends. Be sure to check out the film when it opens Friday October 26, 2012.

 

 

Chasing Mavericks Movie Review

Chasing Mavericks 

 

Starring: Gerard Butler, Jonny Weston, Elisabeth Shue, Abigail Spencer, Leven Rambin

 

 

Directed by Michael Apted & Curtis Hanson

 

Rated: PG

Run Time:  mins

Genre: Drama/Sport/ Based on a True Story

 

Opens October 26th

 

 

By Lisa Minzey of The Reel Critic.com

 

 

For this week’s screening we checked out the film based on the true story of surfer Jay Moriarty, one of the youngest surfers to ever take on a Maverick, one of the biggest waves on Earth. During the filming, Gerard Butler was hospitalized after being injured while filming one of the surf scenes. He was pulled and held underwater by a strong set of waves.

 

The year was 1987 when a 7 year-old boy, Jay Moriarty caught the surfing bug. His neighbor Frosty Hesson (Gerard Butler) saved his life when he slipped off some rocks and was pulled under the current. Frosty had been surfing nearby when he caught sight of Jay and pulled him to safety. Ever since that fateful day, Jay looked up to Frosty and wanted to be a surfer just like him. Jay’s father walked out on him, and his mother, Kristy (Elisabeth Shue) right around the same time, leaving nothing but a letter to explain his actions. Jay, unable to face the truth, locked the letter away to read at a later time.

 

Seven years go by and Jay (Jonny Weston) has become a pretty decent surfer, even racking up a few trophies. He dreams of one day surfing and conquering a Maverick (a wave that is roughly 25 ft. or higher wave). One early morning, Jay sees Frosty pull out his gunner board, one that is designed to take on major waves, like a maverick. He scrambles out of bed and hitches a ride on the roof of Frosty’s van to see the mythical surf.  Sometime later up north on thePacific Coast Highway, Frosty pulls off and joins 3 friends, climbing down the cliff and towards the massive waves rolling in towards the shore.  Up on the ridge, Jay watches with amazement and is busted by Frosty when he returns from his surf adventure.  He begs Frosty to train him to surf he mavericks, is turned down harshly, but is determined to change his mind.

 

Frosty eventually comes around thanks to some cajoling from his wife Brenda (Abigail Spencer) and agrees to train Jay under strict conditions. If he breaks one rule, the training is over. Jay is overjoyed and has now less than 12 weeks to prepare to take on a maverick before the weather pattern changes.  Frosty knows, that for Jay to take on this wave, he needs to make sure all 4 pillars are strong enough (Physical, Mental, Emotional and Spiritual) to withstand the massive aquatic beast. The next 12 weeks will be the most challenging of Jay and Frosty’s lives and the choices they make will affect them and their loved ones for years to come.

 

If there was ever a movie to see on the big screen, I would say this would be a terrific choice. The cinematography was excellent, capturing the essence of the sport with grace and thrilling anticipation. The story was good (as much that can be expected from a PG rating) as it kept it more about the relationships between the characters, the physical and emotional barriers that kept them from finding the joy and peace they desire. Be sure to check it out when it opens in theaters starting Friday October 26, 2012.

Guest review of Cloud Atlas

Cloud Atlas

 

Starring:  Tom Hanks, Halle Berry, Jim Broadbent, Hugo Weaving, Jim Sturgess, Doona Bae, Ben Whishaw, James D'Arcy, Susan Sarandon, Hugh Grant

Directors: Lana Wachowski, Tom Tykwer, Andy Wachowski

Rated: R

Run Time: 172 min

Genre: Drama, SciFi/Fantasy

 

Opens October 26th

Reviewed by Eric Forthunn  from Cinematic Shadows

 

 

Cloud Atlas is one of those definitive masterpieces that so rarely come along in cinema. It's a movie of visual grandeur, deeply felt emotional resonance, intensely detailed characterizations, and a sense of wonderment that we often take for granted. Movies don't sweep us up quite like this anymore, and with good reason: the movie's daringly ambitious, sometimes impenetrably so, but that makes it an invigorating watch. The themes that are drawn between these interwoven stories, all taking place over the span of 600 years (and six different times), work rather perfectly once the movie closes on a borderline exhausting 165-minute running time. Yet if there's any film that warrants such a laborious screen presence, it's one that identifies themes of love, connection, self-identification, and more all through different characters sometimes represented by the same actor. It's an odd strategy, but it grounds the movie massively in a world that should defy understanding; the links formed by these actors, though, and their different time frames and personas, are all embodied by the idea that they arguably love the same people through these times. They're accepting of death, of what it may entail, if only because they have come to terms with what life embodies: the persistence of love, sometimes frustratingly so, is the driving force of the film. The Wachowskis and Tykwer have made one of the most memorable films in years, and its ambition is something even naysayers can't deny.

 

The movie's plot is indistinguishable in terms of a single linear narrative, and attempting to explain it will only confuse the reader/viewer further, so I won't bother going into specifics. A link is crafted between these characters and the various worlds they all inhabit; they all exist in the same timeline, of course, but they act as rebirths of themselves as time goes along. Characters cross race and gender borders that are truly unprecedented in terms of where modern film is. Jim Sturgess predominantly plays an 1800s sick seaman, yet also has an equal amount of screen time as an Asian man in 2144 New Seoul, trying to save a young woman who has been genetically modified to work a life of painful repetition. Said girl, played by Donna Bae, also plays a white woman in the 1800s under a white family, headed by Hugo Weaving, who plays an Asian man in 2144 and a woman in 2012. Halle Berry plays primarily in 1972 an investigative journalist looking into the possible corruption of a nuclear reactor plant, and she also plays a white woman in the 1930s, and a brief moment as a man at a point I won't specify. Jim Broadbent is mainly seen as a 1930s arrogant composer, and a 2012 struggling publisher, yet he also plays a Korean musician for a brief moment. The point is, all of these characters and actors are crossing paths that they never would've dreamed of in other films.

 

The movie's daringly ambitious, and that will certainly be off-putting and inaccessible for some. The build of the film requires absolute attention for its running time, for the explorations of themes occasionally happen briefly and are touched upon later in the film rather subtly. For instance, characters deliver voiceovers that often give us insight into the world and its themes: the connection of our lives, the intersection of each other in current times and previous/future ones, the dominance of love in all of these worlds and the odd way it links souls after they are reborn; all of these are brought up at various points as if they are all of equal importance. Those themes are so thoroughly examined through these characters' actions, though, and so masterfully portrayed by these actors that we buy into every bit of the movie's dominating presence. Pretension is out of the question when it comes to films that want to connect this deeply to human emotion, rooting it in tales that are interwoven by all themes and all times. I often hate it when filmmakers find their films exceedingly more important than they are, making trivial films and trying to bog them down with weighty messages. Yet Cloud Atlas is fundamentally different from those films because it's understanding of the universality of its themes and characters; relating to the film is beyond possible, it's unavoidable.

 

The movie's emphasis on genre filmmaking is also remarkable because the Wachowskis and Tykwer understand the roots of these filmmaking styles. Within the futuristic worlds, of course there are heavily focused features of science fiction, yet at the same time there are prevalent romances in the 2144 and 2400 tales; there's also a fantastical element in 2400 involving Hugo Weaving's character that belittles Tom Hanks'. The 2012 storyline following Jim Broadbent's character being put away in an old folks' home has plenty of slapstick, but later on the elements of a heist film and buddy comedy come into the picture. The 1800s tale on the ship emphasizes the character drama and human emotion coming from these two characters of different races working together, but at the same time there's a tale of corruption and betrayal with Hanks and Broadbent. In 1972, it's clearly mirroring a police procedural, often addressing the clichés of the genre head on through dialogue (including a, "This is where the character typically says that and then dies"), but it ultimately becomes a tale of lost love and finding one's integrity in a sea of corruption. The themes of the film, or the ultimate one of love, are emphasized pervasively through these different worlds, yet that doesn't make it overdone or out-of-control; the more nuanced attempts make for some of the finest scenes of the year, particularly between Hanks and Berry late in the film.

 

The technical components of the film are near flawless, whether that be the film's editing, visual effects, sound effects, make-up, costume design, production design, art direction, you name it. The editing is the most masterful in my opinion, capturing so much of the film's momentum and moving along at a brisk, effortless pace that makes the entire film feel hurried without necessarily being rushed. Scenes don't last too long, but more importantly, the shorter scenes are put together in a way that brings forth their importance: a scene where Ben Winshaw and James D'Arcy are throwing around plates and bowls, talking about the limitless elements of time and space, is one of the most beautifully mesmerizing scenes I've ever seen, yet it's only a thirty-second glimpse into a theme that is often addressed indirectly for most of the movie's running time. The editing makes that scene come at a time when it could've drawn on for four or five minutes, and I wouldn't have necessarily complained, because it's a gorgeous scene. Yet Berner might have done the best editing job of the year, putting together an insurmountable amount of material into something ultimately coherent. Go figure. The make-up jobs, and costume design, not only provide context for these characters and what time they exist in, but also work in ways that make us not question the races they are bending. I didn't mind that Berry and Bae played white characters, because it adds to the themes of the film; nor did I care that Weaving and Sturgess play Asian characters, because it simply works.

 

Everything is connected, the movie often claims. Individually, I don't believe the stories are astounding, or anything revelatory necessarily, but that's not the point of vignette films like this. Cloud Atlas explores these characters through their time periods and directly relates them back to older/newer stories, bringing the story together without there being that big, definitive moment that defines the film. Every instance in the movie is important, as the tagline infers, because these are all moments that connect to one another. Helping a lost soul at one point in time reflects upon what you have done, what you will do, and what you could have done. Hanks has a brilliant moment where he doesn't go out to save his friend, instead hiding behind a rock, seeing himself as a coward. Later in the film, in a role reversal, he's about to be killed, and he's looking for someone to save him just like his friend was. What happens after that defines so much about these characters and the movie's intentions, and even if those themes are remarkably subtle, there are more obvious odes to love and connection. I don't mean that as a bad thing, not in the slightest, just a simple observation about an endlessly complex film.

 

Some might dismiss Cloud Atlas as messy, and while I understand the claim, they might not be looking into it enough to see the bigger picture. It's arguably "messy" for a reason, balancing genres, characters, even worlds that defy easy interpretation. The movie demands analysis, asking the audience to engage with this material in all of its glory. "I know art when I see it" is one of the most defining quotes to grace critics and their judgment of an art form; I certainly know when I've seen a work of art, and directly after viewing I knew what I had just seen would last in my mind. It's a brilliant, bold piece of filmmaking, an attempt at encapsulating human emotion in varying stories that no modern filmmaker has conceived in who knows how long. The closest example is Paul Thomas Anderson's magnificent Magnolia, if only because that's a vignette that focuses on the connectivity of us all. Yet this one brings forth its more fantastical elements, the dystopias that some of these worlds are, and makes them into a commentary on society and our connections. We're all connected in one way or another to a single other person: by love, and if you believe in reincarnation as the movie insists, then you will find that same love at another point in time. I don't remember the last time I saw a film that struck me as much as Cloud Atlas, but I know this: you need to see this film, because if you don't, well, you might be missing out on the best film of the year.

 

Interview with Tom Hanks about Cloud Atlas

Cloud Atlas opens Friday, October 26th

This interview comes to us from Julie Hinds via the Detroit Free Press and Gannett.

 

Two-time Oscar winner and all-around nice guy Tom Hanks is the big-screen everyman of our generation. That's why it's so unexpected to find him starring in what could be the most divisive film of the year.

"Cloud Atlas," which opens Friday, has already provoked a love-it-or-hate-it reaction among cinema lovers. It earned a lengthy and enthusiastic standing ovation at the Toronto International Film Festival. But the early critical buzz has been all over the map. It's either a masterpiece or a mess, depending on who's buzzing.

One thing is clear. The nearly three-hour "Cloud Atlas" seems destined to be one of the most-talked-about films of a particularly strong holiday season, no small feat considering that Steven Spielberg's "Lincoln," Ang Lee's "Life of Pi," Peter Jackson's "The Hobbit," and Tom Hooper's "Les Miserables" are also on the schedule.

Hanks is the perfect ambassador for such a movie, however, because he understands perfectly that it defies capsule descriptions. "Everybody will be like, 'So what's it about?' Ah geez, sit down. Lemme get some coffee and we'll talk for a couple of hours. I'll tell you what the movie's about," he says genially by phone.

Adapted from the novel by David Mitchell, "Cloud Atlas" tells six separate stories that range from the mid-19th-Century South Pacific to a dystopian future where a version of English is spoken that's as different from today's as Shakespeare's is from the modern tongue.

Instead of being told one after the other, these stories are sliced and diced as if a Veg-O-Matic did the film editing and then pieced back together in seemingly random order -- but only seemingly, because there is a cosmic logic and karmic meaning underlying the entire structure.

And did we mention that Hanks, Halle Berry, Hugh Grant, Jim Broadbent, Hugo Weaving and the other actors play multiple roles, sometimes assuming different races, nationalities and genders as necessary?

Not since 1968's "2001: A Space Odyssey" has a film played as fast and loose with traditional narrative forms. It was this epic challenge that made "Cloud Atlas" attractive to Hanks, who keeps a poster of Stanley Kubrick's trippy sci-fi classic in his office.

The 56-year-old actor says his initial encounter with the project was a phone meeting with siblings Lana and Andy Wachowski of the "Matrix" film series and Tom Tykwer of "Run, Lola, Run," who teamed up as co-directors.

Hanks agreed to read a script that, they warned, was a little hard to decipher. "Much like the audiences that I've seen it with, there is a moment of 'Huh? What's happening here?' And then eventually lights start going off in everybody's mind. It certainly did in mine. About 30 pages into it, I understood what the connections were and the remaining 100 or so pages went by like wildfire," he recalls.

Hanks met with the directors at his office in Los Angeles. The conversation drifted to "Moby Dick," which he was just finishing for the first time and which he jokingly refers to as his summer reading assignment.

As they discussed how controversial Herman Melville's classic novel was to 1850s readers, Lana Wachowski said that their ambition was to take the audacity of "Moby Dick" and marry it with "2001: A Space Odyssey," the movie from the poster on the office wall.

"Well, I'll just hear that and I say, 'I'm in,' " says Hanks. "I didn't understand '2001: A Space Odyssey' when I (first) saw it."

At this, Hanks pauses to talk to his staff. "Hey, somebody, go on the Internet and find out what won best picture the year of '2001: A Space Odyssey.' I think it was 'Oliver!' " A few minutes later, his memory is proved right. "Hold on, we have an answer. It was 'Oliver!' Not bad!"

The old-fashioned musical's 1Oscar win in 1969 drives the point home. "There's a huge difference between those two films," he continues. "There's also a huge difference between the lasting legacy of those two films."

Hanks says he relished the challenge of playing multiple characters in the movie, which uses the device to essentially convey the karmic evolution of mankind and how the choices that people make can help move the human condition forward or backward.

The task was liberating because it defied the usual rule that you get to play one character in a movie, or, in most Hanks films, one decent, determined character. Here, he's a devious 19th-Century doctor, a self-loathing futuristic goat-herder named Zachry and a brutal modern-day British author named Dermot Hoggins, among others.

"They're all like courses of the same meal and you like some more than others. Certainly Dermot Hoggins was magnificent. How often do you get to be filled with that much violence and anger?" he notes, referring to the character he was impersonating Friday on "Good Morning America" when he accidentally dropped an F-bomb.

"Cloud Atlas" seems in tune with Web patterns of information consumption, which encourage skipping back and forth between screens instead of deep dives into one text. But the message holds old-school truths, according to Hanks, including this one: Works of art and creativity can alter the lives of people now and in the future.

"Come on now, that's pretty great stuff," he says.

He also thinks the six stories in the film represent lively genres like drama, comedy, action and historical epic. "We're all essentially remaking some version of 'Medea' by way of 'Richard III' by way of 'The Great Train Robbery' by way of 'Casablanca' by way of 'I Love Lucy.' We're all taking a version of that and turning them into new stories."

Hanks (a baseball fan who was rooting for the Detroit Tigers during the Tigers-Yankees pennant race) has the future on his mind. Besides "Cloud Atlas," he recently debuted "Electric City," a futuristic sci-fi Web series for Yahoo he started writing in 2003 on a portable mechanical typewriter. And he's hip to the world of social media, having accumulated more than 5 million Twitter followers.

His vision of the future is that technology and Web connectedness will increasingly allow artists and great thinkers to produce their own works without waiting for support from studios or media gatekeepers. Interestingly, "Cloud Atlas" represents a wave of that future. It's being called the most expensive indie film ever because most of its $100 million-plus budget was raised independently, according to the Hollywood Reporter.

"You no longer have the luxury of saying, 'I got this great idea, if only I could get permission to do it.' You're just going to have to go ahead and do it."

Hanks views the coming glut of creativity as "both fantastic and an absolute mess." But he's not afraid of a crowded consciousness or jammed fiber optic lines, just as he wasn't fearful of tackling "Cloud Atlas."

"It's another version of how great and horrible the future always seems to be," he says. "The future is always one damn thing after another."

Contact Julie Hinds: 313-222-6427 or jhinds@freepress.com

See what the director has to say about his film Smashed

 

 

Smashed opens October 26th exclusively at Harkins Camelview.  The film stars Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Aaron Paul, Octavia Spencer, and Nick Offerman premiered at Sundance in January and is making it's way to theatres. Prior to the film's release, director James Ponsoldt put together his thoughts on the film and here they are....

 

"Smashed" Director's Statement from James Ponsoldt 

 

SMASHED began as a conversation between my co-writer, Susan Burke, and me. In addition to being a very funny person and talented  writer, Susan is the owner of some of the most simultaneously upsetting and hilarious stories I've ever heard about dumb things she did while she was drunk.

 

It’s no coincidence that Susan is now sober. Like a lot of the people closest to me who've had issues with substance abuse, Susan also knows a secret: Being drunk can be really fun. It’s just all the other things that come with being drunk that can be a downer (wrecking cars, lives, etc.).

 

But SMASHED isn’t primarily about alcohol or alcoholics. SMASHED is a film about fidelity – and what it means to be committed to someone, to love someone, and to need to change your life…when your partner isn’t capable of change.

 

So many films that deal with substance abuse follow a familiar “scared straight” path, depicting characters so damaged that they’re not relatable, leaving the audience with nothing to do but gawk at their otherness.

 

SMASHED is a love story – between the main characters, Kate and Charlie, but also hopefully between the audience and the characters. I certainly adore Kate and Charlie. They’re flawed and misguided, and maybe they only work as a couple when they’re falling-down drunk, but I was committed to making a film in which the alcoholics appear light-hearted and are fun to hang out 4 with (perhaps your personal perspective on whether they make a good couple will depend upon your own history of relationships with addicts).

 

SMASHED also is a coming of age story for Kate – except she’s closer to 30 than 20, so I suppose it’s an adult coming of age story. But for a lot of my friends, adulthood seems to be more and more distant (Have kids? Eh…maybe at 40. Regular job? Eh…maybe after I have kids.).

 

I’m not sure if people can really, fundamentally change (and I guess that’s more a conversation for stoned college students), but I do know that films about people with problems attempting to change their lives – even if they’re unsuccessful or perhaps delusional – are some of my favorite  stories. I love watching people try and fail. And try again. And fail worse. There’s something special and heroic and so, so human about seeing someone attempt to conquer her demons and fix her life (even if she isn't necessarily imbued with the wisdom or common sense to have any clue how her life should be fixed).

 

In SMASHED, the demons happen to be alcohol, but really that’s just part of the characters’ circumstance, like their age or where they live (late-20’s and Highland Park, in northeast Los Angeles). Part of becoming an adult means learning to stop blaming your personal history, or genetic make-up, or your partner for your problems. To be able to look at yourself in the mirror and – without a single pill or drop of alcohol – be able to say: “I love myself,” or “I like myself,” or at least, “I don’t want to kill myself,” seems like a pretty decent first step before entering an adult relationship.

 

SMASHED is a story about a young woman taking that first step, stumbling a bit – and seeing if her husband can join her on the journey.

The stars of Fun Size hit Mall of America with Carly Rae Jepsen

Fun Size opens this Friday

On Saturday morning, FUN SIZE stars Victoria Justice and Thomas Mann joined special guest Carly Rae Jepsen at the Mall of America for a surprise appearance at the Nickelodeon Universe in celebration of the opening of FUN SIZE this Friday, October 26.

Excited fans camped outside beginning the night before and thousands of fans attended the event!

The three stars signed autographs, met with their fans and also exclusively debuted Carly Rae Jepsen's new video THIS KISS, which will also be seen by audiences in theaters this weekend ahead of the debut of FUN SIZE

Movie Review for Alex Cross

Alex Cross   

Starring: Tyler Perry, Edward Burns, Matthew Fox, Rachel Nichols, John C. McGinley, Jean Reno, Carmen Ejogo

 

 

Directed by Rob Cohen

 

Rated:  PG-13

Run Time: 101 mins

Genre: Action/ Crime/ Mystery

 

 

Opens October 19th

 

By Lisa Minzey of The Reel Critic.com

 

Next up on deck for this week screenings, is Alex Cross. In a rare treat, Tyler Perry does not direct himself in the film adaptation of the novel by James Patterson, “Cross”.  This film is loosely based on the book, so for the uber fans, the similarities from page to screen are very few.

 

Detective Dr. Alex Cross (Tyler Perry) has on his hands a particularly unusual case. When he and his team, Det. Tommy Kane (Edward Burns) and Monica Ashe (Rachel Nichols) investigate the murder of a young woman who had been tortured, security team executives, Cross knows that they have a mercenary to search for. The only clue they have is a chalk drawing that was left behind, nicknaming the killer Picasso (Matthew Fox).

 

Cross quickly figures out a profile and the target of Picasso's next hit: Erich Nunemacher (Werner Daehn), the chief financial officer of Mercier Industries, owned by Billionaire businessman Leon Mercier (Jean Reno). When the attempted hit goes awry, and the team gets a close look at Picasso, Monica is concerned that they may be targets on the mad men's hit list.

 

Cross, Det. Kane and Chief of Police Richard Brookwell (John C. McGinley) all agreed that due to the nature of the killer's profile, he would be too focused on his next victim. Men should learn to trust a woman's intuition because Monica was correct. She, along with Cross's pregnant wife, Maria (Carmen Ejogo) is Picasso's next victims, sending a message to Cross and Det. Kane. Do not insult Picasso's intelligence nor challenge him because he means business.

 

As a result of Monica's death, Cross is lured into dangerous territory, committing questionable acts that can jeopardize his future career in the FBI and the lives of his remaining loved ones. Will Cross be able to stop Picasso before it is too late or will his vengeance towards the madman destroy all he has left?

 

After discovering that Idris Elba was originally considered for the role of Cross, then had been replaced with Perry, I think the previous casting would have made this a better film. Not to say that Perry was not good, it is difficult to picture him as an action hero. He does bring a certain amount of emotional depth to Cross for the shrink aspect of the character, but this movie lacked a certain edge that the book delivers on. Matthew Fox was an intriguing choice for this role as his physical transformation into Picasso was remarkable, but his facial expressions when trying to communicate mania, came off as comical. For the movie goer that is not too picky on details and just wants to sit back and be entertained for 90 plus minutes, the film delivers on that, but if you are a fan of the book series it may not live up to expectations. You be the judge when "Alex Cross" opens in theaters starting October 19, 2012.

Movie Review for The Paperboy

The Paperboy   

Starring: Zac Efron, Matthew McConaughey, Nicole Kidman, David Oyelowo, John Cusack, Macy Gray, Scott Glenn

 

 

 

Directed by Lee Daniels

 

Rated: R

Run Time: 107 mins

Genre: Drama/ Thriller

 

Opens October 19th

 

By Lisa Minzey of The Reel Critic.com

 

Hey Phoenix Film Fans! This week we checked out the film “The Paperboy” from “Precious” Director Lee Daniels, who was nominated for the Palme d’Or Award at the 2012 Cannes Film Festival. Daniels has a strong track record on bringing trouble characters with intense stories to the silver screen, as in his past works such as “The Woodsman”, “Monster’s Ball” and “Shadowboxer”.

Told through the narration of former housekeeper Anita Chester (Macy Gray), recounts the events of how brothers  Wade (Matthew McConaughey) and Jack Jansen (Zac Efron) met Ms. Charlotte Bless (Nicole Kidman) and her involvement with Death Row inmate Hillary Van Wetter (John Cusack). Charlotte had been corresponding with Hillary for several months and was engaged to married. She wrote to Wade and his writing partner, Yardley Acheman (David Oyelowo) claiming that Hillary is innocent and that he did not receive a fair trial. Wade checks into the query and discovers that there is more to Hillary’s story than originally presented. Can Wade prove Hillary’s innocence before it is too late? Will Jack be able to share his feelings with Charlotte or just live with the unrequited love? Will Wade be able to share his secret with Jack and still maintain a friendly relationship with his brother?

For those who saw the movie Precious, this film is more physically disturbing than its predecessor. This film is gritty, raw, and sadistic, making no apologies for the intensity of the sex, violence and racial division. This is nothing like the crime thrillers set in the south that McConaughey and Cusack have done, where they played the clean cut, likable lawyers or reporters trying to prove a man’s innocence (A Time to Kill, Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil, Runaway Jury). John Cusack is known for his good guy rom-com roles and even in his darker roles,  he is still  likable enough to pull for his character. In this role, Cusack is extremely disturbing, causing him to be seen in a entirely different light. From an acting standpoint, kudos to him for such a strong performance. McConaughy as of late has been showing a darker side to his acting career in the past year (Killer Joe, Magic Mike, Bernie), but this one stands out as the physical and psychological transformation of Ward is astounding. Kidman delivers an equally memorable performance, her most sexually revealing role since Cold Mountain. Efron delivers a strong performance as the sexually frustrated, lovesick Oedipus–esq young man. The make up department deserves a well-deserved mention, as the job performed on Matthew McConaughey after a particularly brutal scene, was impressive, and even held up under water. Overall, it is a decent film, just one that is made for a certain niche type audience. If you enjoy films like Lon Von Trier’s films, or gritty films like Monster’s Ball you will want to check this out when it opens in Phoenix on October 19, 2012.